search for: 46b0908a

On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Virgile Bello <virgile.bello at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. > It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). I too am in the camp that it is a feature to use the standard names. For instance doing a search it google or

Yes of course I understand it was done on purpose. It's just that it makes it impossible to include COFF.h and Windows.h side by side (which probably wasn't necessary until now). On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > IMO the fact that it uses the standard names from the COFF documentation > is a feature, not a bug. > > The elf and

...ncluding windows.h? Or that some std lib C/C++ header is being > included and the OS provided std header is including windows.h? > > -Nick > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130829/46b0908a/attachment.html>