Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "46747".
Did you mean:
467,7
2008 Feb 06
6
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
...t; ----------------------------------
>>
>> Because of the -Werror, this warning is taken as an error
>> and compilation aborts. I wonder why it warns in the first
>> place, is something broken with xgcc?
>
> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has
built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all.
I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
-Chris
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
> > > I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
> >
> > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has
> > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all.
> > I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
>
> I am seeing the same errors with just building...
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
...-------
> >>
> >> Because of the -Werror, this warning is taken as an error
> >> and compilation aborts. I wonder why it warns in the first
> >> place, is something broken with xgcc?
> >
> > I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
>
> Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has
> built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all.
> I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
I am seeing the same errors with just building c,c++. (linux x86, also debia...
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
>>
>> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
>
> Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has
> built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all.
> I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
This looks like something is broken on the gcc side of things. Does a
simp...
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>>> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision
>>>> 46747).
>>>
>>> Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone
>>> has
>>> built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at
>>> all.
>>> I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
>>
>&g...
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
...*** [team.lo] Error 1
> ----------------------------------
>
> Because of the -Werror, this warning is taken as an error
> and compilation aborts. I wonder why it warns in the first
> place, is something broken with xgcc?
I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
Best wishes,
Duncan.
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
I'm on Debian Etch and re-compile llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 from
scratch. I'm on svn revision 46813.
I'm using the following commands for the compilation:
----------------------------------
# Get the sources
mkdir /s/llvm
cd /s/llvm
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk /s/llvm/svn.llvm
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk /s/llvm/svn.gcc42
# Compile llvm
2008 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On 2/6/08, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I suspect this is due to the recent change by Bill (revision 46747).
> >
> > Bill's change only affected darwin IIRC. I don't know that anyone has
> > built GOMP on linux yet, and OpenMP hasn't been widely tested at all.
> > I'd suggest using --enable-languages=c,c++
>
> This looks like something is broken on the gcc...