Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "46596c69".
Did you mean:
46596096
2013 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Appropriate DS for implementing worklist
...LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131103/46596c69/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 03
3
[LLVMdev] Appropriate DS for implementing worklist
Hi,
I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic blocks.
The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and similar
others) and found out this is working in LIFO order when I use the
functions push_back and pop_back_val to insert and delete elements in the
worklist.
Can someone suggest an appropriate DS to implement my worklist. Note: I am
not concerned about