Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "464b".
Did you mean:
464
2010 Jul 09
2
Xen bridge no longer working
...:52 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:52 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:5232 (5.1 KiB) TX bytes:5232 (5.1 KiB)
peth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet6 addr: fe80::260:97ff:fe20:464b/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:98 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:5880 (5.7 KiB) TX bytes:1234 (1...
2017 Sep 26
2
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...chineCopyPropagation changes to forward registers (which is
currently reverted). The verification in question is:
*** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
- function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
- interval: %vreg77
[192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r 1 at 208B-phi
2 at 312r 3 at 380r
0: valnos 0 1 3
1: valnos 2
In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator that
is creating the multiple components in the %vreg77 live interval. If
you look at the attached debug dump file, just after the greedy
allocator ru...
2017 Sep 26
0
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...on changes to forward registers (which is currently reverted). The verification in question is:
>
> *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
> - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
> - interval: %vreg77 [192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r 1 at 208B-phi 2 at 312r 3 at 380r
> 0: valnos 0 1 3
> 1: valnos 2
>
> In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator that is creating the multiple components in the %vreg77 live interval. If you look at the attached debug dump file, just after the gre...
2017 Sep 26
2
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...orward registers (which is currently reverted). The verification in question is:
>>
>> *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
>> - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
>> - interval: %vreg77 [192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r 1 at 208B-phi 2 at 312r 3 at 380r
>> 0: valnos 0 1 3
>> 1: valnos 2
>>
>> In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator that is creating the multiple components in the %vreg77 live interval. If you look at the attached debug dump file, jus...
2017 Sep 26
0
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...(which is currently reverted). The verification in question is:
>>>
>>> *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
>>> - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
>>> - interval: %vreg77 [192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r 1 at 208B-phi 2 at 312r 3 at 380r
>>> 0: valnos 0 1 3
>>> 1: valnos 2
>>>
>>> In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator that is creating the multiple components in the %vreg77 live interval. If you look at the attached deb...
2017 Sep 27
2
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...he verification in question is:
>>>>
>>>> *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
>>>> - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
>>>> - interval: %vreg77
>>>> [192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r
>>>> 1 at 208B-phi 2 at 312r 3 at 380r
>>>> 0: valnos 0 1 3
>>>> 1: valnos 2
>>>>
>>>> In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator
>>>> that is creating the multiple components in the %vre...
2017 Sep 27
0
[MachineCopyPropagation] Issue with register forwarding/allocation/verifier in out-of-tree target
...The verification in question is:
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Bad machine code: Multiple connected components in live interval ***
>>>>> - function: utils_la_suite_matmul_ref
>>>>> - interval: %vreg77 [192r,208B:0)[208B,260r:1)[312r,364r:2)[380r,464B:3) 0 at 192r 1 at 208B-phi 2 at 312r 3 at 380r
>>>>> 0: valnos 0 1 3
>>>>> 1: valnos 2
>>>>>
>>>>> In this particular case, I believe that it is the greedy allocator that is creating the multiple components in the %vreg77 live interval....
2013 Nov 05
3
rails 4 logging during development, surpress asset messages?
Is it possible to surpress all those asset related messages?
I have a terminal open where I run ''rails s'' and it gets hard to read.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
2017 Oct 13
2
Machine Scheduler on Power PC: Latency Limit and Register Pressure
...8;
G8RC:%vreg9,%vreg7,%vreg8
440B %vreg12<def> = DIVD %vreg10, %vreg11;
G8RC:%vreg12,%vreg10,%vreg11
448B %vreg15<def> = DIVD %vreg13, %vreg14;
G8RC:%vreg15,%vreg13,%vreg14
456B %vreg18<def> = DIVD %vreg16, %vreg17;
G8RC:%vreg18,%vreg16,%vreg17
464B %vreg21<def> = DIVD %vreg19, %vreg20;
G8RC:%vreg21,%vreg19,%vreg20
472B %vreg5<def> = ADDIStocHA %X2, <ga:@A>;
G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg5
480B %vreg6<def> = LDtocL <ga:@A>, %vreg5, %X2<imp-use>;
mem:LD8[GOT] G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%...
2013 Jun 06
1
Introducing MailJack: autogenerate querystring parameters that are appended to links in your emails
...n email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/23fbeb20-bca0-464b-8dbe-465bad654093%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
2014 Jul 23
1
Question about adding DNS records
Hello all,
I managed to install an extra DC.
The first DC is comsrv01a with ip 192.168.0.200.
I run Samba 4.1.9 and BIND 9.8.1-P1.
The new DC is srv01ham with ip 172.16.32.222.
I use the internal DNS.
I run Samba 4.1.9.
I use a permanent LAN-2-LAN VPN via my Draytek routers.
The first DC (comsrv01a, 192.168.0.200) is my primary DNS server. This is
configured in all my routers and DHCP servers.
2020 Apr 07
2
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is:
* ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize
* In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6)
* The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the
2020 Apr 15
4
[ARM] Register pressure with -mthumb forces register reload before each call
...4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp
448B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
464B tBX_RET 14, $noreg
# End machine code for function f.
********** SIMPLE REGISTER COALESCING **********
********** Function: f
********** JOINING INTERVALS ***********
entry:
16B %2:tgpr = COPY $r2
Considering merging %2 with $r2
Can only merge into reserved registers.
32B %1:tgpr = COPY $r1...
2017 Oct 13
3
Machine Scheduler on Power PC: Latency Limit and Register Pressure
...;> 440B %vreg12<def> = DIVD %vreg10, %vreg11; G8RC:%vreg12,%vreg10,%vreg11
>> 448B %vreg15<def> = DIVD %vreg13, %vreg14; G8RC:%vreg15,%vreg13,%vreg14
>> 456B %vreg18<def> = DIVD %vreg16, %vreg17; G8RC:%vreg18,%vreg16,%vreg17
>> 464B %vreg21<def> = DIVD %vreg19, %vreg20; G8RC:%vreg21,%vreg19,%vreg20
>> 472B %vreg5<def> = ADDIStocHA %X2, <ga:@A>; G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg5
>> 480B %vreg6<def> = LDtocL <ga:@A>, %vreg5, %X2<imp-use>; mem:LD8[GOT] G8RC_...
2012 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...B,464r:1)
416B%vreg48<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg48,%vreg3
register: %vreg48 +[416r,448B:0) phi-join +[448B,480r:1)
432B%vreg49<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg49,%vreg13
register: %vreg49 +[432r,448B:0) phi-join +[448B,496r:1)
BB#1:# derived from
464B%vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg47<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg5,%vreg47
register: %vreg5 +[464r,592B:0) +[880B,992r:0)
480B%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
register: %vreg6 +[480r,592B:0) +[592B,704r:0) +[880B,1056r:0)
496B%vreg7<def> = COPY %vreg49<k...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg48,%vreg3
> register: %vreg48 +[416r,448B:0) phi-join +[448B,480r:1)
> 432B%vreg49<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg49,%vreg13
> register: %vreg49 +[432r,448B:0) phi-join +[448B,496r:1)
> BB#1:# derived from
> 464B%vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg47<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg5,%vreg47
> register: %vreg5 +[464r,592B:0) +[880B,992r:0)
> 480B%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
> register: %vreg6 +[480r,592B:0) +[592B,704r:0) +[880B,1056r:0)
> 496B%vreg7<def>...
2012 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] liveness assertion problem in llc
...%p.04] IntRegs:%vreg26,%vreg14 dbg:../src/getbits.c:56:5
432B %vreg27<def> = ADDri %vreg27<kill>, 1, pred:%noreg; IntRegs:%vreg27 dbg:../src/getbits.c:55:5
448B %vreg17<def> = CMPLT_U %vreg27, %vreg6, pred:%noreg; PredRegs:%vreg17 IntRegs:%vreg27,%vreg6 dbg:../src/getbits.c:53:3
464B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, pred:%noreg, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use>
480B CALL <ga:@CGA_kernel_advance>, 0, 0, pred:%noreg, 0, %noreg, %P0<imp-def>, %P1<imp-def>, %P2<imp-def>, %P3<imp-def>, %P15<imp-def>, %RT<imp-def>, %P0<imp-use>, %P1<imp-u...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...= COPY %vreg2<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg47,%vreg2
> 416B%vreg48<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg48,%vreg3
> 432B%vreg49<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg49,%vreg13
> Successors according to CFG: BB#1
>
>
> // LOOP CONDITION
> 464B%vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg47<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg5,%vreg47
> 480B%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
> 496B%vreg7<def> = COPY %vreg49<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg7,%vreg49
> 512B%vreg29<def> = SETGT_INT 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, %vreg0,...
2012 Oct 24
3
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...COPYs....
400B%vreg47<def> = COPY %vreg2<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg47,%vreg2
416B%vreg48<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg48,%vreg3
432B%vreg49<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg49,%vreg13
Successors according to CFG: BB#1
// LOOP CONDITION
464B%vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg47<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg5,%vreg47
480B%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
496B%vreg7<def> = COPY %vreg49<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg7,%vreg49
512B%vreg29<def> = SETGT_INT 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, %vreg0, 0, 0, 0, %vreg...