search for: 462d

Scary. http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2005_08.php#003876 -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

...nd it would be unjust *not* to divide the bounty with them, but on the other hand, if the bounty is to be divided, I think the uncertainty about exactly how that would happen might be a factor in why the bounty has gone unclaimed for so long. - a -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

...ba_dnsupdate --verbose will give you: [root at node1 etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose Looking for DNS entry A tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry A node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 192.168.134.27 as node1.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry CNAME 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc as 365d2a9f-bfe6-462d-965e-8622bfefc190._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc. Looking for DNS entry SRV _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.tuebingen.tst.loc node1.tuebingen.tst.loc 88 as _kerberos._tcp.Default-First-Site-Na...

Hey Richard, Could you share the following informations please? 1. gluster volume info <volname> 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs Regards, Karthik On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > On a side note, try recently released health

On a side note, try recently released health report tool, and see if it does diagnose any issues in setup. Currently you may have to run it in all the three machines. On 26-Oct-2017 6:50 AM, "Amar Tumballi" <atumball at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for this report. This week many of the developers are at Gluster > Summit in Prague, will be checking this and respond next

...27:afr_log_selfheal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed data selfheal on fad05e24-743c-4e35-a878-a8ee29ee81b2. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:29.377977] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-metadata.c:52:__afr_selfheal_metadata_do] 0-home-replicate-0: performing metadata selfheal on d389a479-6ca8-462d-a0c6-610efa790392 [2017-10-25 10:40:29.381627] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:1327:afr_log_selfheal] 0-home-replicate-0: Completed metadata selfheal on d389a479-6ca8-462d-a0c6-610efa790392. sources=0 [2] sinks=1 [2017-10-25 10:40:29.390169] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:132...