search for: 45ms

...ource file (another ~20ms is loading the pre-jit'd image through an ObjectCache). I thought I'd save some time by using getLazyBitcodeModule, since the IR isn't actually needed right away, but this only reduced the parsing time (ie the time of the actual getLazyBitcodeModule() call) to 45ms, which I thought was surprising. I also tested computing the bytewise-xor of the bitcode file to make sure that it was fully read into memory, which took about 5ms, so the majority of the time does seem to be spent parsing. Then I switched back to ParseBitcodeFile, but now I added the "-stri...

...~20ms > is loading the pre-jit'd image through an ObjectCache). I thought I'd save > some time by using getLazyBitcodeModule, since the IR isn't actually needed > right away, but this only reduced the parsing time (ie the time of the > actual getLazyBitcodeModule() call) to 45ms, which I thought was > surprising. I also tested computing the bytewise-xor of the bitcode file > to make sure that it was fully read into memory, which took about 5ms, so > the majority of the time does seem to be spent parsing. > > Then I switched back to ParseBitcodeFile, but now...

...e pre-jit'd image through an ObjectCache). I thought >>> I'd save some time by using getLazyBitcodeModule, since the IR isn't >>> actually needed right away, but this only reduced the parsing time (ie the >>> time of the actual getLazyBitcodeModule() call) to 45ms, which I thought >>> was surprising. I also tested computing the bytewise-xor of the bitcode >>> file to make sure that it was fully read into memory, which took about 5ms, >>> so the majority of the time does seem to be spent parsing. >>> >>> Then I sw...

...Auth-User,CN=Users,DC=subdomain,DC=example,DC=de" -w xxxx -b "OU=myou,DC=subdomain,DC=example,DC=de" "(cn=user.name)" real??? 0m0.047s user??? 0m0.026s sys??? 0m0.009s When trying to get the gidNumber of all groups the user is member of this request takes around 378ms (- 45ms roughly bind/unbind overhead): # time ldapsearch -H ldaps://10.12.100.1:636 -D "CN=Auth-User,CN=Users,DC=subdomain,DC=example,DC=de" -w xxxx -b "OU=courses,OU=myou,DC=subdomain,DC=example,DC=de" "(&(objectclass=group)(member=CN=user.name,OU=Employees,OU=Users,OU=myo...

Mike, No they have not. Calls are failing again today. They have offered to refund my money but that does not solve the problem. My asterisk server is only 4 to 12 ms away from their "network". I have had VERY good luck with nufone.(40 to 45ms away) Only have 1 or 2% fail rate. Going to be calling txlink.net on Monday. Seems that LiveVoIP does not care about asterisk users. They like to pass the blame. -Tim On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 17:04, Mike Dent wrote: > Hmmm, I was contemplating going with livevoip, glad I read your post. > I...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64904 Priority: medium Bug ID: 64904 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [BISECTED] nouveau, nv50: External VGA not detected anymore QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

Interesting. Might be worth giving a try again to the idea of creating the file in anonymous memory and using a write to output it. Cheers, Rafael On 23 November 2016 at 02:41, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> LLD supports

Anyone know if it''s possible to interleave two IP packets when using PPPoA and VC based lines? Can it be done with any PPPoE implementations? The goal is to reduce the delay when you have a high priority packet waiting, but a lower priority (large) packet already started going out ahead of this packet. I don''t want the overhead of much smaller MTU, which is the other way

...ile 1.038 ms Time for CreateObject 48134.541 ms Time for CreateBinary 48179.720 ms Time for Compile 48187.351 ms And before someone says "but you are running a debug build", if I run the "production", it does speed things up quite nicely, about 3x, but still takes 17 seconds vs 45ms with that build of the compiler. ../lacsap -no-memcpy -tt longcompile.pas -O0 Time for Parse 0.937 ms Time for Analyse 0.005 ms Time for Compile 0.559 ms Time for CreateObject 17241.177 ms Time for CreateBinary 17286.701 ms Time for Compile 17289.187 ms ../lacsap -tt longcompile.pas Time for Pa...

Environment: rvm ruby 1.9.2-p180 rails 3.1.rc1 Conditions: gem "coffee-script" # in Gemfile at least one file with .js.coffee (even empty inside) in app/assets Result: WEBrick or Unicorn hangs. Only kill -9 <pid> helps. P.S. What additional info should I provide? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.

Hi. I wrote in a reply to a mail on here recently that you can''t set mpu (minimum packet unit) on HTB as you can on CBQ. I''ve just noticed that there is a patch on devik''s site which does mpu and overhead. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ For dsl users mpu is, for practical purposes going to be 106 - overhead is still variable though, depending on packet size.

Hello, I''m a newbie. I need help resolving this issue. I recently added a pdf to the newsletter admin section of the website and now I can no longer view page 2 of the list of pdf''s. Nor can I login to see the newsletters as a student. I''m using Ruby 1.9.3, Rails 3.2.1. Here''s the information from the log file. ActionView::Template::Error (undefined

[Just curious, and seizing the opportunity to communicate with other folks who are doing the same kind of thing I am...] How are you measuring the latency? I tried measuring it with my program (also Win32-based, also using DirectSound[Capture]) and came up with around 130ms. To measure it, I placed the mic near a speaker to get feedback going, had my program connect to itself (local

I've definitely "run into this problem", and I would very much love to remove my kludges [that are incomplete, because I keep finding places where I need to modify the code-gen to "fix" the same problem - this is probably par for the course from a complete amateur compiler writer and someone that has only spent the last 14 months working (as a hobby) with LLVM]. So whilst