Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "453939e4".
Did you mean:
4533974
2011 Nov 29
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: How should Clang/LLVM runtime libraries be installed and found during link steps?
...ts it, normal .o
> > files where it supports those, and .a files only as a fallback. Not very
> > confident of these preferences though.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111129/453939e4/attachment.html>
2011 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: How should Clang/LLVM runtime libraries be installed and found during link steps?
Hey Chandler,
We already have a certain precedent for how we do this on Darwin. The
current library set is:
--
$ find lib/clang/3.1/lib
lib/clang/3.1/lib
lib/clang/3.1/lib/darwin
lib/clang/3.1/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.10.4.a
lib/clang/3.1/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.cc_kext.a
lib/clang/3.1/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.eprintf.a
lib/clang/3.1/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.ios.a
2011 Nov 23
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How should Clang/LLVM runtime libraries be installed and found during link steps?
It has come up when reviewing Kostya's patch to add the necessary support
fort linking in the Address Sanitizer runtime library that we need a proper
scheme and plan for deploying runtime libraries along with Clang.
I've CC'ed llvmdev on this for compiler-rt developers' input.
The key issues I see when locating runtime libraries are the following:
- These libraries should be