search for: 452mb

...Input/output error cp: cannot stat ?1/usr/lib/debug?: Input/output error [...] And now in dmesg, thousands of [ 1663.722490] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x425f96d0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8 Out of what should have been 3.5GB of data in 1/, I was able to get 452MB. That's not so bad for just a normal mount and copy. I am in fact shocked the file system mounts, and stays mounted. Yay XFS. -- Chris Murphy

...therswitch that has 1 Gb/s port and the > > rest 100Mb/s. > > Gigabit could be considered overkill. I hope I have answered this point very clearly above. Using 100-Base-T this will be the system I/O bottleneck. > > > PS: The 3WARE IDE RAID give you an I/O bandwidth of up to 452MB/s, > > compared with 320 Mbits/s on fastest SCSI. Big difference in > > poerformance! > > Be aware that those are pure numbers that, unfortunately, don't translate > into the real world. I hope I addressed this adequately above. > My experience is that the U320 SCSI...

On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: > I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again > with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate > it. > > What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of pages each, with the index cards interleaved in the

I am going to list my current plans for rebuilding a Law Firm?s network. I hope that someone will be able to tell me which project (samba or samba-tng) would be a better choice, or if staying with MS is the only choice. If my plan could be changed for the better, input would be greatly appreciated: A lot of this information is useless for my questions, but I am throwing it in anyway. --------