search for: 450,20

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "450,20".

Did you mean: 450,10
2014 Jan 16
0
[PATCH net-next v4 3/6] virtio-net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for improved performance
...)) { pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers missing\n", dev->name, num_buf); dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; break; } - page = virt_to_head_page(buf); + page = virt_to_head_page(mergeable_ctx_to_buf_address(ctx)); put_page(page); --rq->num; } @@ -419,17 +450,20 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len) if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr) + ETH_HLEN)) { pr_debug("%s: short packet %i\n", dev->name, len); dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; - if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) - put_...
2014 Jan 16
13
[PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation
2014 Jan 16
13
[PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation
2014 Jan 17
7
[PATCH net-next v5 0/6] virtio-net: mergeable rx buffer size auto-tuning
The virtio-net device currently uses aligned MTU-sized mergeable receive packet buffers. Network throughput for workloads with large average packet size can be improved by posting larger receive packet buffers. However, due to SKB truesize effects, posting large (e.g, PAGE_SIZE) buffers reduces the throughput of workloads that do not benefit from GRO and have no large inbound packets. This
2014 Jan 17
7
[PATCH net-next v5 0/6] virtio-net: mergeable rx buffer size auto-tuning
The virtio-net device currently uses aligned MTU-sized mergeable receive packet buffers. Network throughput for workloads with large average packet size can be improved by posting larger receive packet buffers. However, due to SKB truesize effects, posting large (e.g, PAGE_SIZE) buffers reduces the throughput of workloads that do not benefit from GRO and have no large inbound packets. This
2014 Jan 16
6
[PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation
2014 Jan 16
6
[PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: allow > 0 order atomic page alloc in skb_page_frag_refill
skb_page_frag_refill currently permits only order-0 page allocs unless GFP_WAIT is used. Change skb_page_frag_refill to attempt higher-order page allocations whether or not GFP_WAIT is used. If memory cannot be allocated, the allocator will fall back to successively smaller page allocs (down to order-0 page allocs). This change brings skb_page_frag_refill in line with the existing page allocation
2018 May 15
12
[PATCH libldm 00/12] New API: an ability to retrieve created device-mapper devices back after they have been created.
The main goal of these patch series is to implement a new API that allows to retrieve created device-mapper devices for volumes and partitions back after they have been created. As part of this patch: - required libdevmapper version was bumped to 1.02. I think it is safe because it was released more then 10 years ago; - newer version of libdevmapper allowed to simplify code base a little bit; -