Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "44b".
Did you mean:
440
2017 Feb 02
3
Register allocator behaves differently when compiling with and without -g
...he slot index for each instruction. As an example, without -g
a snippet of a basic block looks like this:
32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1; REG1:%vreg29
36B %vreg44<def> = LDImm 1103515245; REG1:%vreg44
40B %vreg143:vsub32_1<def,read-undef> = LDImm 0; REG2:%vreg143
44B %vreg68<def> = LDImm 12345; REG1:%vreg68
64B %vreg143:vsub32_0<def> = COPY %vreg143:vsub32_1; REG2:%vreg143
72B %vreg78<def> = LDImm 32; REG1:%vreg78
But when I specify -g, this becomes:
32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1; REG1:%vreg29 dbg:path/to/sourc...
2017 Feb 02
2
Register allocator behaves differently when compiling with and without -g
...struction. As an example, without -g a snippet of a basic block looks like this:
>
> 32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1; REG1:%vreg29
> 36B %vreg44<def> = LDImm 1103515245; REG1:%vreg44
> 40B %vreg143:vsub32_1<def,read-undef> = LDImm 0; REG2:%vreg143
> 44B %vreg68<def> = LDImm 12345; REG1:%vreg68
> 64B %vreg143:vsub32_0<def> = COPY %vreg143:vsub32_1; REG2:%vreg143
> 72B %vreg78<def> = LDImm 32; REG1:%vreg78
>
> But when I specify -g, this becomes:
>
> 32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1;...
2017 Feb 02
2
Register allocator behaves differently when compiling with and without -g
...struction. As an example, without -g a snippet of a basic block looks like this:
>
> 32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1; REG1:%vreg29
> 36B %vreg44<def> = LDImm 1103515245; REG1:%vreg44
> 40B %vreg143:vsub32_1<def,read-undef> = LDImm 0; REG2:%vreg143
> 44B %vreg68<def> = LDImm 12345; REG1:%vreg68
> 64B %vreg143:vsub32_0<def> = COPY %vreg143:vsub32_1; REG2:%vreg143
> 72B %vreg78<def> = LDImm 32; REG1:%vreg78
>
> But when I specify -g, this becomes:
>
> 32B %vreg29<def> = LDImm 1;...
2013 Apr 06
5
arrange data
...A NA NA NA ...
$ 34B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 36A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 36B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 42A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 42B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 44A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 44B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 47A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 47B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 48A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 48B: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 50A: num NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ...
$ 50B: num NA NA NA NA...
2010 Sep 10
10
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7670] New: rsync --hard-links fails where ditto succeeds
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7670
Summary: rsync --hard-links fails where ditto succeeds
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: Dave at Yost.com
2011 Nov 25
1
Recovering from kernel panic / reboot cycle importing pool.
...&numbufs, &dbp), file:
../../common/fs/zfs/dmu.c, line: 796
ffffff00f8578880 genunix:assfail+7e ()
ffffff00f8578930 zfs:dmu_write+17f ()
ffffff00f85789e0 zfs:space_map_sync+295 ()
ffffff00f8578a70 zfs:metaslab_sync+2de ()
ffffff00f8578ad0 zfs:vdev_sync+d5 ()
ffffff00f8578b80 zfs:spa_sync+44b ()
ffffff00f8578c20 zfs:txg_sync_thread+247 ()
ffffff00f8578c30 unix:thread_start+8 ()
----- END PANIC -----
I then ran zdb -e -bcsvL tank and got this output after letting it run all night:
----- SNIP -----
Traversing all blocks to verify checksums ...
zdb_blkptr_cb: Got error 50 reading <...
2002 Oct 30
1
Crontab ??
**********************************************************************
Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo s?o confidenciais
e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organiza??o para o qual foi enviado.
Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique Redes@bnc.pt
Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper
n?o tendo sido encontrados virus.
2005 Dec 21
9
question about changejournal
Hi,
I''ve got a newbie question--sorry if this is covered elsewhere, I parsed
through the archives for awhile and didn''t see it.
I''d like to listen for whenever a file is renamed (e.g. foo.txt -> foo.old)
and then magically change it back. This sounds odd, but I''m working with a
stubborn application and this will actually make things work nice.
So, if I do:
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking