search for: 448b

...20B%vreg3:sel_w<def> = COPY %vreg28<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg3 R600_Reg32:%vreg28 register: %vreg3 replace range with [304r,320r:1) RESULT: [304r,320r:1)[320r,416r:0)  0 at 320r 1 at 304r 336B%vreg1<def> = COPY %vreg26<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg1,%vreg26 register: %vreg1 +[336r,448B:0) +[448B,592B:0) +[880B,1168B:0) +[592B,832r:0) 352B%vreg1:sel_w<def> = COPY %vreg17<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg1 R600_TReg32:%vreg17 register: %vreg1 replace range with [336r,352r:1) RESULT: [336r,352r:1)[352r,832r:0)[880B,1168B:0)  0 at 352r 1 at 336r 368B%vreg13<def> = MOV 1, 0,...

...= COPY %vreg28<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg3 > R600_Reg32:%vreg28 > register: %vreg3 replace range with [304r,320r:1) RESULT: > [304r,320r:1)[320r,416r:0)  0 at 320r 1 at 304r > 336B%vreg1<def> = COPY %vreg26<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg1,%vreg26 > register: %vreg1 +[336r,448B:0) +[448B,592B:0) +[880B,1168B:0) +[592B,832r:0) > 352B%vreg1:sel_w<def> = COPY %vreg17<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg1 > R600_TReg32:%vreg17 > register: %vreg1 replace range with [336r,352r:1) RESULT: > [336r,352r:1)[352r,832r:0)[880B,1168B:0)  0 at 352r 1 at 336r > 368B%vre...

...B#0>, %vreg11, <BB#3>; R600_Reg32:%vreg7,%vreg13,%vreg11 > 416B%vreg29<def> = SETGT_INT 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, %vreg0, 0, 0, 0, %vreg7, 0, 0, 0, 1, pred:%PRED_SEL_OFF, 0; R600_Reg32:%vreg29,%vreg0,%vreg7 > 432B%vreg30<def> = COPY %vreg29; GPRI32:%vreg30 R600_Reg32:%vreg29 > 448B%PREDICATE_BIT<def> = PRED_X %vreg30<kill>, 152, 16; GPRI32:%vreg30 > 464BJUMP <BB#3>, pred:%PREDICATE_BIT<kill> > 480BJUMP <BB#2>, pred:%noreg > Successors according to CFG: BB#2(4) BB#3(124) > > 496BBB#2: derived from LLVM BB %31 > Predeces...

...%vreg13, <BB#0>, %vreg11, <BB#3>; R600_Reg32:%vreg7,%vreg13,%vreg11 416B%vreg29<def> = SETGT_INT 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, %vreg0, 0, 0, 0, %vreg7, 0, 0, 0, 1, pred:%PRED_SEL_OFF, 0; R600_Reg32:%vreg29,%vreg0,%vreg7 432B%vreg30<def> = COPY %vreg29; GPRI32:%vreg30 R600_Reg32:%vreg29 448B%PREDICATE_BIT<def> = PRED_X %vreg30<kill>, 152, 16; GPRI32:%vreg30 464BJUMP <BB#3>, pred:%PREDICATE_BIT<kill> 480BJUMP <BB#2>, pred:%noreg    Successors according to CFG: BB#2(4) BB#3(124) 496BBB#2: derived from LLVM BB %31    Predecessors according to CFG: BB#1 512...

Hi list, I''m using Dom0 gentoo with xen 3.0.4 and xenman. I have several DomU working and it is really nice :) so all my DomUs are installed with disk images. Now i want to use an ISO to boot and install a linux system (or win). When i try to boot the DomU i dont have nothing, nothing relevant (for me) in logs and i can connect to the console. The state of the DomU is unknow. Any help

...4) G8RC:%vreg20 G8RC_and_G8RC_NOX0:%vreg1 424B %vreg4<def> = DIVD %vreg2, %vreg3; G8RC:%vreg4,%vreg2,%vreg3 432B %vreg9<def> = DIVD %vreg7, %vreg8; G8RC:%vreg9,%vreg7,%vreg8 440B %vreg12<def> = DIVD %vreg10, %vreg11; G8RC:%vreg12,%vreg10,%vreg11 448B %vreg15<def> = DIVD %vreg13, %vreg14; G8RC:%vreg15,%vreg13,%vreg14 456B %vreg18<def> = DIVD %vreg16, %vreg17; G8RC:%vreg18,%vreg16,%vreg17 464B %vreg21<def> = DIVD %vreg19, %vreg20; G8RC:%vreg21,%vreg19,%vreg20 472B %vreg5<def>...

Hello Folks, We're using Samba as AD servers along with Windows AD Servers (2008R2 FL). We also use SCCM (Current Branch) that is dependent on AD for lab deployments (Windows 10). Currently, SCCM (current branch) supports 2008R2 FL, but for how long??? Samba does not support 2012R2, 2016, 2019 FL. We'd like to remove the Windows Servers from our AD infrastructure, but would also like

Thank for your help. You're right, merging vreg32 and vreg48 is perfectly fine, sorry I missed that. I "brute force" debuged by adding MachineFunction dump after each join, I think I found the issue : it's when vreg32 and vreg10 are merged. vreg10 only appears in BB#3, and the join only occurs in BB#3 apparently even if vreg32 lives in the 4 machine blocks After joining, there

Hi Vincent, On 25/10/2012 18:14, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > When examining the debug output of regalloc, it seems that joining 32bits reg also joins 128 parent reg. > > If I look at the : > %vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg6:sel_y; R600_Reg32:%vreg34 R600_Reg128:%vreg6 > > instructions ; it gets joined to : > 928B%vreg34<def> = COPY %vreg48:sel_y; > > when vreg6 and

...ed Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 7.6G 7.0G 216M 98% / # du -shx / 4.2G / # find / -xdev | wc -l 161021 # tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 tune2fs 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) Filesystem volume name: <none> Last mounted on: <not available> Filesystem UUID: a3f40d6f-51be-448b-bf71-76292772fea0 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: has_journal filetype needs_recovery sparse_super Default mount options: (none) Filesystem state: clean Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Ino...

If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is: * ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize * In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6) * The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the

...4, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp 448B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 464B tBX_RET 14, $noreg # End machine code for function f. ********** SIMPLE REGISTER COALESCING ********** ********** Function: f ********** JOINING INTERVALS *********** entry: 16B %2:tgpr = COPY $r2 Considering merging %...

...0:%vreg1 >> 424B %vreg4<def> = DIVD %vreg2, %vreg3; G8RC:%vreg4,%vreg2,%vreg3 >> 432B %vreg9<def> = DIVD %vreg7, %vreg8; G8RC:%vreg9,%vreg7,%vreg8 >> 440B %vreg12<def> = DIVD %vreg10, %vreg11; G8RC:%vreg12,%vreg10,%vreg11 >> 448B %vreg15<def> = DIVD %vreg13, %vreg14; G8RC:%vreg15,%vreg13,%vreg14 >> 456B %vreg18<def> = DIVD %vreg16, %vreg17; G8RC:%vreg18,%vreg16,%vreg17 >> 464B %vreg21<def> = DIVD %vreg19, %vreg20; G8RC:%vreg21,%vreg19,%vreg20 >> 472B...

...- -dsk/total- -net/total- ---paging-- ---system-- usr sys idl wai hiq siq| read writ| recv send| in out | int csw 0 0 45 55 0 0| 0 392k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 85 22 0 0 50 50 0 0| 0 296k| 126B 322B| 0 0 | 64 10 0 0 65 35 0 0| 24k 472k| 448B 486B| 0 0 | 114 99 1 1 20 78 0 0| 120k 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 86 96 0 0 49 51 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 9 12 0 1 64 36 0 0|2720k 456k| 276B 178B| 0 0 | 151 124 0 0 100 0 0 0| 0 0 | 196B 178B| 0...

...- -dsk/total- -net/total- ---paging-- ---system-- usr sys idl wai hiq siq| read writ| recv send| in out | int csw 0 0 45 55 0 0| 0 392k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 85 22 0 0 50 50 0 0| 0 296k| 126B 322B| 0 0 | 64 10 0 0 65 35 0 0| 24k 472k| 448B 486B| 0 0 | 114 99 1 1 20 78 0 0| 120k 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 86 96 0 0 49 51 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 9 12 0 1 64 36 0 0|2720k 456k| 276B 178B| 0 0 | 151 124 0 0 100 0 0 0| 0 0 | 196B 178B| 0...

...i32 0, i32 0)] IntRegs:%vreg14,%vreg8 dbg:../src/getbits.c:56:5 416B STBrr %vreg26, 0, %vreg14<kill>, pred:%noreg; mem:ST1[%p.04] IntRegs:%vreg26,%vreg14 dbg:../src/getbits.c:56:5 432B %vreg27<def> = ADDri %vreg27<kill>, 1, pred:%noreg; IntRegs:%vreg27 dbg:../src/getbits.c:55:5 448B %vreg17<def> = CMPLT_U %vreg27, %vreg6, pred:%noreg; PredRegs:%vreg17 IntRegs:%vreg27,%vreg6 dbg:../src/getbits.c:53:3 464B ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, pred:%noreg, %SP<imp-def>, %SP<imp-use> 480B CALL <ga:@CGA_kernel_advance>, 0, 0, pred:%noreg, 0, %noreg, %P0<imp-def>, %P...

...ysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Exception handling support for a target > Message-ID: <6ecb510e-448b-830f-5a4a-0e2e2425c318 at codeaurora.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 1/22/2018 8:40 AM, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 22 Jan 2018, at 14:15, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>...