Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "447g".
Did you mean:
447
2017 Oct 10
3
/boot partition too small
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 10 October 2017 at 09:55, KM <info4km at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition. When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size. it's too small and I
2017 Oct 11
4
/boot partition too small
...ed Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root
> ?????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% /
> tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot
> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home
> ????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home
Your root filesystem is in an LVM volume. CentOS 6 is still using GRUB legacy, which does not support /boot in LVM.
For you, there really is no way around the messy and delicate process of shrinking and relocating a filesystem and the LVM volumes to make space for a larger /boot partit...
2017 Oct 11
0
/boot partition too small
...>> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root
>> ??????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% /
>> tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm
>> /dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot
>> /dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home
>> ?????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home
>
> Your root filesystem is in an LVM volume. CentOS 6 is still using GRUB
> legacy, which does not support /boot in LVM.
says up there, /boot is /dev/sda1, this is almost exactly the config of
my C6 servers.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
2017 Oct 10
0
/boot partition too small
...Filesystem??????????? Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_root
?????????????????????? 50G?? 26G?? 22G? 55% /
tmpfs???????????????? 9.0G? 156K? 9.0G?? 1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1????????????? 96M?? 33M?? 59M? 36% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg_bldsrv-lv_home
????????????????????? 861G? 371G? 447G? 46% /home
Most of this is like speaking another language to me anyway.? I'll consider it all.
KM
On ?Tuesday?, ?October? ?10?, ?2017? ?10?:?42?:?21? ?AM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:...
2011 Nov 09
3
Data distribution not even between vdevs
...98.3K
c3t600221900085288900000425490FB07Cd0 - - 3 10
223K 98.3K
c3t600221900085288900000434490FB24Ed0 - - 3 10
223K 98.3K
c3t60022190008528890000043949100968d0 - - 3 10
224K 98.2K
raidz1 5.88T 447G 5 17 16.0K
67.7K
c3t60022190008528890000056B4CB79D66d0 - - 3 12
215K 12.2K
c3t6002219000854867000004B94CB79F91d0 - - 3 12
216K 12.2K
c3t6002219000854867000004BB4CB79FE1d0 - - 3 12
214K 12.2K
c3t6002219000854867000...
2013 Sep 10
2
Re: libvirt-1.1.2-r1 (Gentoo) fails to start LXC containers (subject line minor edit, was libvirt-1.2.2-r1)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dennis Jenkins
> <dennis.jenkins.75@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah our security people got a bit over zealous. That's being rectified.
>
> :)
> >
> > TL;DR: My container is configured to use "br0" for its networking. "br0"