Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "44738c57".
Did you mean:
447385
2012 Jul 26
3
[LLVMdev] proposal for exploiting undefined behavior much more aggressively
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/761
Thanks,
John
2012 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] proposal for exploiting undefined behavior much more aggressively
On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:58 AM, John Regehr wrote:
> http://blog.regehr.org/archives/761
It's an interesting post, but I'd like to point out that it is a non-goal for the project to be actively hostile to users of the compiler. :) It is useful to have debugging tools for people who really care, but "exploiting" undefined behavior just for the sake of breaking code is a
2012 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] proposal for exploiting undefined behavior much more aggressively
...y grow some serious
teeth. This should allow users to check their code fairly aggressively for
UB but not needlessly punish code or those debugging code.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120727/44738c57/attachment.html>