search for: 445g

...224B0001559BB471d0 - - 12 29 835K 1.02M mirror 257G 439G 32 52 571K 1.04M c8t22480001552D7AF8d0 - - 14 28 1003K 1.04M c4t1d0 - - 14 32 1002K 1.04M mirror 251G 445G 28 53 543K 1.02M c8t227F0001552CB892d0 - - 13 28 897K 1.02M c8t22250001559830A5d0 - - 13 30 897K 1.02M mirror 17.4G 427G 22 38 339K 393K c8t22FA00015529F784d0 - - 9 19 648K 393K...

...ng myself: azathoth replicates with yog-sothoth, so I compared their brick directories. `ls -R /var/local/brick0/data | md5sum` gives the same result on both servers, so the filenames are identical in both bricks. However, `du -s /var/local/brick0/data` shows that azathoth has about 3G more data (445G vs 442G) than yog. This seems consistent with my assumption that the problem is on yog-sothoth (everything is fine with only azathoth; there are problems with only yog-sothoth) and I am reminded that a few weeks ago, yog-sothoth was offline for 4-5 days, although it should have been brought back u...

...veman for even proceeding with this venture in the first place, because it has developed into something very exciting. -David (Not Reveman ;P) [ 2.6.16-gentoo-r12, AMD Opteron 165@1.8GHz Dual Core, 2x1G G.Skill DDR533 184-pin, e-VGA nVidia 7900GT KO, Silverstone Strider 600W, Asus A8N-SLI-Premium, 445G disk space]

I'm using gluster for a virt-store with 3x2 distributed/replicated servers for 16 qemu/kvm/libvirt virtual machines using image files stored in gluster and accessed via libgfapi. Eight of these disk images are standalone, while the other eight are qcow2 images which all share a single backing file. For the most part, this is all working very well. However, one of the gluster servers

...replicates with yog-sothoth, so I compared their brick > directories. `ls -R /var/local/brick0/data | md5sum` gives the same > result on both servers, so the filenames are identical in both bricks. > However, `du -s /var/local/brick0/data` shows that azathoth has about 3G > more data (445G vs 442G) than yog. > > This seems consistent with my assumption that the problem is on > yog-sothoth (everything is fine with only azathoth; there are problems > with only yog-sothoth) and I am reminded that a few weeks ago, > yog-sothoth was offline for 4-5 days, although it should...