search for: 442m

...Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 131G 4.7G 120G 4% / /dev/sdc1 271G 147G 111G 58% /home /dev/sdd1 271G 3.9G 253G 2% /home/adminusers /dev/sda1 99M 20M 74M 22% /boot tmpfs 442M 0 442M 0% /dev/shm ====================================================== Each night, in addition to our tape backup paradigm, an rsync script is run which mounts /dev/sdb1 on /mnt/sysinfo and copies system data from sda1 there. /dev/sdb1 is a 146GB drive. The script then mounts /dev/s...

...m Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 131G 130G 0 100% / /dev/sdc1 271G 156G 102G 61% /home /dev/sdd1 271G 4.5G 253G 2% /home/905 /dev/sda1 99M 29M 66M 31% /boot tmpfs 442M 0 442M 0% /dev/shm # cat /etc/fstab /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/home /home ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=/home/905 /home/905 ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=/boot...

...Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 131G 4.6G 120G 4% / /dev/sdc1 271G 141G 117G 55% /home /dev/sdd1 271G 3.9G 253G 2% /home/admin /dev/sda1 99M 20M 74M 22% /boot tmpfs 442M 0 442M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda 11M 11M 0 100% /media/TestCD df: `status': No such file or directory df: `status': No such file or directory Any ideas why the 'status' messages are showing 'No such file or directory'? More info: # cat /etc/fstab /d...

...st 484M lli 480M clang-query 473M clang-refactor 469M clang-move 468M global-symbol-builder 467M clang-change-namespace 464M tool-template 464M clang-rename 462M clang-reorder-fields 460M find-all-symbols 456M clang-doc 452M clang-include-fixer 444M modularize 443M clang-func-mapping 442M clang-diff 441M libToolingExample00 438M pp-trace 434M diagtool 184M llvm-cfi-verify 170M llvm-objdump 168M sancov 158M llvm-rtdyld 149M llvm-ar 148M llvm-nm 145M llvm-extract 145M llvm-link 142M llvm-dwarfdump 141M llvm-split 131M llvm-mc 127M llvm-pdbutil 126M clang-offload-bundle...

...9M clang-move > 468M global-symbol-builder > 467M clang-change-namespace > 464M tool-template > 464M clang-rename > 462M clang-reorder-fields > 460M find-all-symbols > 456M clang-doc > 452M clang-include-fixer > 444M modularize > 443M clang-func-mapping > 442M clang-diff > 441M libToolingExample00 > 438M pp-trace > 434M diagtool > 184M llvm-cfi-verify > 170M llvm-objdump > 168M sancov > 158M llvm-rtdyld > 149M llvm-ar > 148M llvm-nm > 145M llvm-extract > 145M llvm-link > 142M llvm-dwarfdump > 141M llvm-...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Hi I know some of this has been discussed in the past but I can''t quite find the exact information I''m seeking (and I''d check the ZFS wikis but the websites are down at the moment). Firstly, which is correct, free space shown by "zfs list" or by "zpool iostat" ? zfs list: used 50.3 TB, free 13.7 TB, total = 64 TB, free = 21.4% zpool iostat: used

Hi, I recently updated from puppet 3.1.1 to 3.2.1 and noticed quite a bit of increased load on the puppetmaster machine. I''m using the Apache/passenger/rack way of puppetmastering. Main symptom is: higher load on puppetmaster machine (8 cores): - 3.1.1: around 4 - 3.2.1: around 9-10 Any idea why there''s more load on the machine with 3.2.1? -- You received this

Hi, so here it is, LZ4 compression method inside btrfs. The patchset is based on top of current Chris'' for-linus + Andi''s snappy implementation + the fixes from Li Zefan. Passes xfstests and stresstests. I haven''t measured performance on wide range of hardware or workloads, rather wanted to publish the patches before I get distracted again. I''d like to ask