Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "4401e80b".
Did you mean:
4401809
2013 Oct 17
0
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine should have a non-Module creator
...e the first module is ready and skipping construction with later modules.
or
2) supplying a dummy Module to the creator and then removeModule(M).
Yaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131017/4401e80b/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine should have a non-Module creator
With the support of Multi-modules, it makes sense to have a creator /
constructor for ExecutionEngine that does not require a module.
The use-case is a program using one EE created at initialization that holds
many modules created later, as needed.
Workaround for current API could be
1) using a pointer to EE init with NULL, delaying the actual EE
construction to the time the first module is