Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "43x".
Did you mean:
43
2004 Aug 24
1
Autoattend detecting same digit twice
...seen a problem where the autoattend detects the first digit twice?
What I am seeing is this:
My extensions are 421-468.
When a caller calls in and dials exten 433 from the autoattendant, they get
exten 443. This is happen for any extension that is valid in the 44x range (i.e.
42x -> 442, 43x -> 443, 44x -> 444, etc.). I am seeing this problem about 1/3 of the time.
My setup is 6 PSTN (POTS) lines -> AccessBankII channel bank -> T100P card on the asterisk server -> Cisco 7940's and 7960's.
I have been through the wiki and the archives, but haven't found any...
2014 Sep 22
2
Retuning compression levels
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> Currently, compression settings are as follows
>>
>> -6, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -r 6-A tukey(0.5)
>> -7, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -e -r 6-A tukey(0.5)
>> -8, -l 12 -b 4096 -m -e -r 6-A tukey(0.5)
>>
>> I suggest the following, in case my previous patch is accepted
>>
>> -6, -l 8 -b 4096 -m -r 6 -A tukey(0.5);partial_tukey(2)
2014 Sep 22
2
Retuning compression levels
...>
> Any thoughts?
From <http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparison>
it seems that the decoding of -8 is about 6% slower than -5. Sometimes
the difference is bigger but doesn't exceed 10%.
The only exception is "Freescale i.MX21 (454MHz ARM926EJ?-S, Fuze+)":
43x vs 35x realtime. But the decoding time is so small (4 sec vs 5 sec)
that it can be some measurement error.
2006 Feb 24
17
Re: [nfs-discuss] bug 6344186
Joseph Little wrote:
> I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for
> bugs are no available to outsiders.
>
> What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our
> snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to
> access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.