search for: 43m

...mory than the centos4.8 servers. Here's an example from top: --- centos 5.5 --- $ uname -a Linux ws51 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 29 12:50:31 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 7799 nobody 16 0 348m 101m 43m S 0.0 2.6 1:10.91 httpd 20285 nobody 15 0 340m 94m 43m S 0.0 2.4 1:11.36 httpd 31734 nobody 15 0 340m 91m 41m S 0.0 2.3 1:13.52 httpd 8904 nobody 15 0 341m 89m 39m S 0.0 2.3 0:35.28 httpd 7353 nobody 15 0 336m 87m 42m S 0.0 2.2 1:21.17 httpd 260...

I (work :) bought a USB2.0/Firewire enclosure and I had a little trouble with it until I came across this page http://people.freebsd.org/~maho/USB/comment/ku350a.txt after trying the sysctl things work well. I haven't tried the USB2.0 side of it, as I don't have any USB2.0 controllers. The Firewire bit works great too (quite a bit faster than USB1 :) The enclosure in question is made

In the panic of replacing our firewall(s) earlier in the week, we ended up moving our original shorewall 1.4 config onto a machine with 2.0.10 already installed, overwriting all the 2.0.10 config files. Most things seem to work fine, except for our masq entries. I''ve examined the default 2.0.10 files compared with our 1.4 files, and can''t spot the problem. What am I missing?

Hola: Tengo unos datos con varias fechas y horas como texto (son independientes: las horas no corresponden al día de la fecha). Seria algo como: DATOS <- data.frame(FECHA=c("31/10/2014","23/10/2014", "31/10/2014"), HORA=c("01:23", "12:43", "23:09")) No tengo problema de convertir la fecha para poder realizar

...ting FF, region selection still lagging and jerky. Top shows PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 32160 root 20 0 221m 75m 13m R 68.7 1.0 1192:08 Xorg 2025 hardtolo 20 0 1479m 281m 78m R 14.6 3.6 226:35.72 soffice.bin 1035 wild-bil 20 0 1116m 315m 43m S 7.6 4.0 196:15.91 firefox The FF above is different user, with which there are generally no effects because of low usage. Xorg dropped from 76.5% at the time I posted yesterday. So even with that heavy user's FF shutdown, Xork (a new snigglet?!) is taking a big slice of CPU time when the o...

...still > lagging and jerky. Top shows > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 32160 root 20 0 221m 75m 13m R 68.7 1.0 1192:08 Xorg > 2025 hardtolo 20 0 1479m 281m 78m R 14.6 3.6 226:35.72 soffice.bin > 1035 wild-bil 20 0 1116m 315m 43m S 7.6 4.0 196:15.91 firefox > > The FF above is different user, with which there are generally no > effects because of low usage. Xorg dropped from 76.5% at the time I > posted yesterday. So even with that heavy user's FF shutdown, Xork (a > new snigglet?!) is taking a big sli...

...764 apache 20 0 476m 49m 9456 S 0.3 0.1 0:21.82 httpd 17757 apache 20 0 461m 42m 5784 S 0.3 0.1 0:18.26 httpd 19108 apache 20 0 463m 44m 5848 S 0.3 0.1 0:20.80 httpd 19155 apache 20 0 463m 44m 5756 S 0.3 0.1 0:17.15 httpd 24791 apache 20 0 462m 43m 5764 S 0.3 0.1 0:14.87 httpd 24794 apache 20 0 464m 45m 5780 S 0.3 0.1 0:15.07 httpd 29668 apache 20 0 459m 40m 5888 S 0.3 0.1 0:34.05 httpd 29794 apache 20 0 463m 44m 5868 S 0.3 0.1 0:35.23 httpd 31184 apache 20 0 936m 688m 9572 S 0.3 1.1 103:33.80...

...mpfs tmpfs 215M 0 215M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 215M 280K 215M 1% /run tmpfs tmpfs 215M 0 215M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs tmpfs 215M 0 215M 0% /tmp /dev/mmcblk0p1 vfat 90M 49M 41M 55% /boot tmpfs tmpfs 43M 0 43M 0% /run/user/1000 $ lscpu: Architecture: armv6l Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 1 On-line CPU(s) list: 0 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 1 Socket(s): 1 Vendor ID: ARM Model: 7 Model name: ARM1176 St...

...ifs 36K ./.BOITE_RECEPTION 36K ./.PIGE 80K ./dovecot 428K ./.Drafts 728K ./.Alert Process 1020K ./.Trash 1.3M ./.Junk 3.4M ./cur 3.6M ./.Alert BLANC 7.5M ./.Alert PUB 9.7M ./.IT SUPPORT 9.9M ./.GLPI 12M ./.REGIE 15M ./.LTO 27M ./.VDN 29M ./.Sent 43M ./.HD SUPPORT 105M ./.MAM 105M ./.PRTG 514M ./.INBOX 883M . root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] /var/vmail/domain.tld/m.stefan # cat maildirsize 1073741824S 1098898439 9380 -382366814 -439 382 1 27713 1 -383309268 -489 27433 1 4274 1 27740 1 31452 1 -665709 -153 5722 1 5797 1 27713 1 1...

I am using dovecot lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # grep virtual_transport /etc/postfix/main.cf # transport_maps = hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/transport-mailman, proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf # virtual_transport = maildrop virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp root at messagerie[10.10.10.19] ~ # On Thursday, February 9, 2017 7:54 PM, WJCarpenter

...Processed: 85 Uptime: 7h 18m 50s PID: 9135 Sessions: 1 Processed: 907 Uptime: 7h 16m 27s PID: 8777 Sessions: 1 Processed: 342 Uptime: 7h 18m 49s PID: 10508 Sessions: 1 Processed: 51 Uptime: 6h 47m 6s PID: 10853 Sessions: 1 Processed: 603 Uptime: 6h 43m 9s PID: 10620 Sessions: 1 Processed: 939 Uptime: 6h 45m 52s PID: 11438 Sessions: 1 Processed: 870 Uptime: 6h 30m 8s PID: 12582 Sessions: 1 Processed: 448 Uptime: 6h 9m 59s PID: 12670 Sessions: 1 Processed: 400 Uptime: 6h 8m 46s For comparison, most of our se...

...it can achieve very high IO throughput with high > parallelism (at both FE/client side and backend). > > a) Single profile without profile merging : ~60m > b) Profile merging enabled: > b.1) pool size == 1: ~80m > b.2) pool size == 2: ~47m > b.3) pool size == 3: ~43m > b.4) pool size == 4: ~40m40s > b.5) pool size == 5: ~38m50s > b.6) pool size == 10: ~36m48s > b.7) pool size == 32: ~36m24s > c) >3000 profile file without profile merging (%p): ~35m24s > > b.6), b.7) and c) have the best performance among all. > >...

...01:10 host2-backup-home-p2t.zip -rwx------ 1 backup backup 130M Sep 23 01:10 host2-backup-home-u2z.zip -rwx------ 1 backup backup 11M Sep 23 01:01 host2-backup-mysql.zip -rwx------ 1 backup backup 133M Sep 23 01:01 host2-backup-staff.zip -rwx------ 1 backup backup 43M Sep 23 01:01 host2-backup-var.zip -rwx------ 1 backup backup 29B Sep 23 01:10 host2-zip-end.txt -rwx------ 1 backup backup 29B Sep 23 01:01 host2-zip-start.txt Sat Sep 24 07:06:26 EDT 2005 building file list ... done archive/ archive/host1-backup-etc.zip archive/host1-backup-home...

Is it just me or does Xorg/Gnome seem slow and clunky to any other desktop users once the 6.7 upgrade is done? $ uname -a Linux CentOS501.homegroannetwork 2.6.32-573.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 25 17:05:50 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.7 (Final) Top shows PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 32160 root

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > I have thought about this issue too, in the context of games. We may want > to turn profiling only for certain frames (essentially, this is many small > profile runs). > > However, I have not seen it demonstrated that this kind of refined data > collection will actually improve PGO results in

I have thought about this issue too, in the context of games. We may want to turn profiling only for certain frames (essentially, this is many small profile runs). However, I have not seen it demonstrated that this kind of refined data collection will actually improve PGO results in practice. The evidence I do have though is that IIRC Apple have found that almost all of the benefits of PGO for

Hi, I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think) ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device], I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with shorewall on it. I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces. I also what still to alow connection sharing

...UGre='\e[4;32m'; IGre='\e[0;92m'; BIGre='\e[1;92m'; On_Gre='\e[42m'; On_IGre='\e[0;102m'; Yel='\e[0;33m'; BYel='\e[1;33m'; UYel='\e[4;33m'; IYel='\e[0;93m'; BIYel='\e[1;93m'; On_Yel='\e[43m'; On_IYel='\e[0;103m'; Blu='\e[0;34m'; BBlu='\e[1;34m'; UBlu='\e[4;34m'; IBlu='\e[0;94m'; BIBlu='\e[1;94m'; On_Blu='\e[44m'; On_IBlu='\e[0;104m'; Pur='\e[0;35m'; BPur='\e[1;35m'; UPur=...

...192.168.0.255 LEN=267 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=138 DPT=138 LEN=247 NAT Table Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 88769 packets, 5812K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 718K packets, 43M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 21 1260 ppp0_masq all -- * ppp0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 722K packets, 43M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source...