Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "438m".
Did you mean:
438
2012 Jan 15
0
[CENTOS6] mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value - during server startup
...chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 10 lose cover
RAM: 182M
gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 9 lose cover RAM: 182M
gran_size: 128M chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 182M
gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 5 lose cover
RAM: 438M
gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 5 lose cover
RAM: 438M
gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 6 lose cover RAM: 438M
gran_size: 256M chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 7 lose cover RAM: 438M
gran_size: 512M chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 5...
2018 Apr 27
3
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...refactor
469M clang-move
468M global-symbol-builder
467M clang-change-namespace
464M tool-template
464M clang-rename
462M clang-reorder-fields
460M find-all-symbols
456M clang-doc
452M clang-include-fixer
444M modularize
443M clang-func-mapping
442M clang-diff
441M libToolingExample00
438M pp-trace
434M diagtool
184M llvm-cfi-verify
170M llvm-objdump
168M sancov
158M llvm-rtdyld
149M llvm-ar
148M llvm-nm
145M llvm-extract
145M llvm-link
142M llvm-dwarfdump
141M llvm-split
131M llvm-mc
127M llvm-pdbutil
126M clang-offload-bundler
122M llvm-mca
121M verify-uselistorder...
2018 Apr 27
0
Size of produced binaries when compiling llvm & clang sources
...467M clang-change-namespace
> 464M tool-template
> 464M clang-rename
> 462M clang-reorder-fields
> 460M find-all-symbols
> 456M clang-doc
> 452M clang-include-fixer
> 444M modularize
> 443M clang-func-mapping
> 442M clang-diff
> 441M libToolingExample00
> 438M pp-trace
> 434M diagtool
> 184M llvm-cfi-verify
> 170M llvm-objdump
> 168M sancov
> 158M llvm-rtdyld
> 149M llvm-ar
> 148M llvm-nm
> 145M llvm-extract
> 145M llvm-link
> 142M llvm-dwarfdump
> 141M llvm-split
> 131M llvm-mc
> 127M llvm-pdbutil
>...
2010 Feb 08
5
zfs send/receive : panic and reboot
<copied from opensolaris-dicuss as this probably belongs here.>
I kept on trying to migrate my pool with children (see previous threads) and had the (bad) idea to try the -d option on the receive part.
The system reboots immediately.
Here is the log in /var/adm/messages
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Feb 8 16:07:09 amber ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ffffff014ba86e40:
Feb 8
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would