search for: 4362d8c9

...This isn't about whether the assembler is integrated or not, it is about whether the assembler supports a particular syntax on a particular platform. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140224/4362d8c9/attachment.html>

First, I would assume this would be better spelled as: __has_feature(integrated_assembler) But I agree with others that "integrated assembler" isn't a feature which should be observable in source code. On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On a higher level, there's the quality issue. People should test for >