search for: 42ul

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "42ul".

Did you mean: 2ul
2006 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
...32-bit unsigned is what is expected on the target you're compiling for. This is exactly why its important to configure llvm-gcc as a cross-compiler for your target. If you do, I'm sure that you'll find it will generate: unsigned long test (unsigned long ltmp_0_1) { return (ltmp_0_1 + 42ul); } assuming that "unsigned long" is a 32-bit unsigned long on your target. Reid. > > Philipp > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/...
2006 Nov 24
2
[LLVMdev] Byte code portability (was Re: libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C)
Reid Spencer schrieb: > Hi Philipp, > > On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 20:09 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: >> Reid Spencer schrieb: >> >>> Note that C and LLVM types are *not* the same things (despite the >>> similar names). We are in the process of making this abundantly clear. >>> The LLVM IR will soon use names like i8, i16, i32, and i64 (signless