Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "42c".
Did you mean:
42
1999 Jun 11
1
SMBMOUNT on SGI
I would like to use smbmount on a SGI running IRIX 6.5.1m. The distribution
of samba for IRIX does not include the executables smbmount or smbmnt. Is
there a source for these executables?
Regards,
Fred
--------------------------------------
Fred Kunzler Phone: (281) 575-5090
91-1SE-42C Pager: (800) 618-5062
10200 Bellaire Blvd. Fax: (281) 575-5473
Houston, TX 77072 E-mail: fred.kunzler@halliburton.com
<mailto:fred.kunzler@halliburton.com>
1999 Jul 19
1
Saving MS Word Documents to a Samba Share from NT
...with create mode = 0777 and force create mode = 0777 with no
success. I have no problems with other applications, including MS Excel, MS
PowerPoint, Visio, Notepad or MS Project.
I tried the saving a Word document from Windows 95 and had no problem.
Regards,
Fred Kunzler
Systems Analyst
91-1SE-42C Phone: (281) 575-5090
10200 Bellaire Blvd. Pager: (800) 618-5062
Houston, TX 77072 Fax: (281) 575-5473
E-mail: fred.kunzler@halliburton.com <mailto:fred.kunzler@halliburton.com>
2001 Jun 21
0
oops in ext3_new_block / 2.2.19/0.0.7a
...[<c0146136>] [<c0143bd2>]
[<c01267c0>] [<c010b018>] [<c010a0b8>] [<c010002b>]
Code: f3 ab f6 c3 02 74 02 66 ab f6 c3 01 74 01 aa 83 c4 f8 6a 01
>>EIP; c0142ba3 <ext3_new_block+557/6c8> <=====
Trace; c014ff63 <do_get_write_access+403/42c>
Trace; c014574d <ext3_alloc_block+39/44>
Trace; c014ffa8 <journal_get_write_access+1c/7c>
Trace; c014fffd <journal_get_write_access+71/7c>
Trace; c0145d5a <block_getblk+16a/31c>
Trace; c0146136 <ext3_getblk+22a/238>
Trace; c0143bd2 <ext3_file_write+566/95c>
T...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...gt; -00000427 <__FUNCTION__.21033>:
> - 427: 72 65 jb 48e <__FUNCTION__.21766+0xe>
> +00000427 <__FUNCTION__.20946>:
> + 427: 72 65 jb 48e <__FUNCTION__.21679+0xe>
> 429: 63 6f 72 arpl %bp,0x72(%edi)
> 42c: 64 fs
> 42d: 5f pop %edi
> 42e: 62 61 73 bound %esp,0x73(%ecx)
> 431: 65 gs
> 432: 5f pop %edi
> - 433: 76 61 jbe 496 <__FUNCTION__.21766+0x16>
> + 433...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the