Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "41e81dc6".
2013 Oct 24
1
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
...rst, than vectorized
as them
* can be any of the three types above (1, 2, 3)
With the dependency being:
1 -> { 2, 3} -> {4, 5}
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131024/41e81dc6/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
On Oct 23, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 23 October 2013 16:05, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:
> In the examples you gave there are no reduction variables in the loop vectorizer’s sense. But, they all have memory accesses that are strided.
>
> This is what I don't get. As far as I understood, a
2013 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
On 23 October 2013 16:05, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote:
> In the examples you gave there are no reduction variables in the loop
> vectorizer’s sense. But, they all have memory accesses that are strided.
>
This is what I don't get. As far as I understood, a reduction variable is
the one that aggregates the computation done by the loop, and is used