Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "4185bf77".
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...hosting and
having that on 9 would be a good thing.
-- Brooks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/4185bf77/attachment.sig>
2013 Jan 11
5
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Alright, trying to get this conversation back on track...
It seems as though the question to ask is: do the benefits of the C++11
features we want outweigh the cost of alienating users of older compilers?
For Mac, the question seems almost moot since clang is a fully-supported
compiler. On Linux, it is most often (always?) possible to bootstrap clang
or a newer GCC, so a baseline like 4.5/4.6