Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "41675".
Did you mean:
4165
2009 Jun 26
2
ACLs, imap and launchd
I was going to experiment with ACLs when I faced a small problem.
It is just sufficient to enable the acl plugin for getting the
behavior described hereafter.
When launching dovecot from the command line, one gets:
sh-3.2# /usr/local/dovecot/sbin/dovecot -F
ILoading modules from directory: /usr/local/dovecot-1.2.rc6/lib/
dovecot/imap
IModule loaded:
2020 Aug 25
3
[Debuginfo] Changing llvm.dbg.value and DBG_VALUE to support multiple location operands
...e the existing ones, but a total replacement would be a better outcome. This is not a full RFC but is intended to ensure that this change doesn't catch anyone by surprise and that there are no significant objections.
[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41675#c8
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139441.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200825/1e11e6bd/attachment.html>
2005 Dec 29
1
Hamlet' question about wine and scanner: to be or not to be (supported)?
Hi,
I have an old partport optical scanner (an LG Scanwork 36a)...
Of course,I can't use this scanner with linux (no driver).
So, I'm trying to install win-driver with wine. :-)
I read documentation (unfortunately insufficient) and... I fell in an "Hamlet'
question"!
The wine user manual asserts that I can install scanner's win-driver in wine,
unfortunately with too
2020 Sep 15
2
[Debuginfo] Changing llvm.dbg.value and DBG_VALUE to support multiple location operands
...the user that they have no write-access to x throughout the function. Because of this I don't believe that it would be right to make the first dbg.value an r-value; I think again that choosing to apply these restrictions should be left to the debugger.
[0] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41675#c8
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200915/c0ca235b/attachment-0001.html>
2020 Sep 11
2
[Debuginfo] Changing llvm.dbg.value and DBG_VALUE to support multiple location operands
> Can you elaborate what "direct" means? I'm having trouble understanding what the opposite (a non-exact value) would be.
Apologies, "exact" was a misleading/incorrect term. By direct, I mean that the expression computes the value of the variable, as opposed to its memory address, or the value that it points to. Within LLVM, where we don't have DW_OP_reg/DW_OP_breg
2020 Sep 02
2
[Debuginfo] Changing llvm.dbg.value and DBG_VALUE to support multiple location operands
...ones, but a total replacement would be a better outcome. This is not a full RFC but is intended to ensure that this change doesn't catch anyone by surprise and that there are no significant objections.
>
> [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
> [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41675#c8
> [2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139441.html
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part -------------...