search for: 40redhat

...m/e/h24oga-h02h13s2-1w/isd/6381163954/lTfQQJ_9/?hs=false&tok=2oumAa6oXER581 -- Vous recevez des invitations ? vous connecter par e-mail. Cliquez ici si vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir ces e-mails?: http://www.linkedin.com/e/h24oga-h02h13s2-1w/vWcWV9D2EK_7Q_zEDG501GEnjHMAFwR5EYt/goo/ovirt-devel%40redhat%2Ecom/20061/I2215607842_1/?hs=false&tok=2XyW98HmPER581 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ovirt-devel/attachments/20120321/bac552f...

I''m trying to make sure a specific user has a special ssh key used as his identity file. so I''m trying something like: augeas{"user_second_key": context => "/files/home/user/.ssh/config", changes => [ "ins IdentityFile after /files/home/user/.ssh/config/IdentityFile[last()]", " set

...now VYSHAKH KRISHNAN CH: https://www.linkedin.com/e/-v6wknk-hr03wgb1-6h/isd/19706316761/43cr4Cgy/?hs=false&tok=2T55fcOOLVLm41 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/-v6wknk-hr03wgb1-6h/qxeZrUjp1nwyb3Pfqiy3okSt-vmyBELIgd/goo/ext3-users%40redhat%2Ecom/20061/I6368510451_1/?hs=false&tok=0HqWpZGkfVLm41 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.

...sistema. ¡Divértete! El Equipo de Badoo Has recibido este email de Badoo Trading Limited (dirección postal a continuación). Si no desea recibir futuras comunicaciones por parte de Badoo, haz clic aquí para desactivarlas: https://us1.badoo.com/impersonation.phtml?lang_id=7&email=libvirt-users%40redhat.com&block_code=fdde5d.&m=21&mid=51e14031000000000007000001f1ad310252eb3f00e9 Badoo Trading Limited es una sociedad de responsabilidad limitada registrada en Inglaterra y Gales con número 7540255 y domicilio en Media Village, 131 - 151 Great Titchfield Street, Londres, W1W 5BB.

...uot;syzkaller-bugs" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/df4f2cf6-8469-f894-8f45-7c48a6a1801f%40redhat.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

Looks like more iotlb locking mess? On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:21:00PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > commit 6b1e6cc7855b09a0a9bfa1d9f30172ba366f161c > Author: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu Jun 23 06:04:32 2016 +0000 > > vhost: new device IOTLB API > > bisection log:

I have successfully (I believe) built (rebuilt on Ubuntu 14.04), installed, and used libvirt 1.2.2. Behaviorally I can't tell the difference between what I've built and what Ubuntu distributes. Specifically, "virsh capabilities" shows this: <secmodel> <model>apparmor</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel>

Now that we're supporting things like Ada and the GSP, there's situations where we really need to actually know the display state that we're starting with when loading the driver in order to prevent breaking GSP expectations. The first step in doing this is making it so that we can read the current state of IORs from nvkm in DRM, so that we can fill in said into into the atomic state.

On 2019/7/24 ??10:38, Eric Biggers wrote: > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions > to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.] > > Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually > marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the vhost subsystem. I've listed > these

Currently, NO_PREFETCH is passed implicitly through drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf_push::length and drm_nouveau_exec_push::va_len. Since this is a direct representation of how the HW is programmed it isn't really future proof for a uAPI. Hence, fix this up for the new uAPI and split up the va_len field of struct drm_nouveau_exec_push, such that we keep 32bit for va_len and 32bit for flags. For