Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "40b3866d".
2006 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Times/Sizes of LLVMCore.o vs libLLVMCore.a
...environment that improves with the
use of libLLVMCore.a
Thanks,
Reid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libVMCore.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7091 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060531/40b3866d/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060531/40b3866d/attachme...
2006 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] Times/Sizes of LLVMCore.o vs libLLVMCore.a
(Sorry, previous post got sent by accident. This is the real one)
Folks,
Here's some timing results looking at LLVM when it uses libLLVMCore.o
vs. libLLVMCore.a. We're trying to decide which way to go and thought
some data would help.
The net of it is that using libLLVMCore.a is cheaper in both time and
size of executables. We save 37 seconds on linking LLVMCore and about 1
minute 30