search for: 408g

So, I took four 1.5TB drives and made RAIDZ, RAIDZ1 and RAIDZ2 pools. The sizes for the pools were 5.3TB, 4.0TB, and 2.67TB respectively. The man page for RAIDZ states that "The raidz vdev type is an alias for raidz1." So why was there a difference between the sizes for RAIDZ and RAIDZ1? Shouldn''t the size be the same for "zpool create raidz ..." and "zpool

...(the minor problem) and the whole system will hang and need to be power cycled after a while. First, here is the zfs setup: # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT pool1 169G 23.5G 146G 13% ONLINE - pool2 408G 123G 285G 30% ONLINE - # zpool status pool: pool1 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0s0 ONLINE 0...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would