search for: 40454

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "40454".

Did you mean: 4044
2005 Mar 10
1
Errors when searching large folders
I am getting errors from dovecot when trying to search, in large Maildir folders. The folder has 40454 messages and is 371MB in size. The email client is squirrelmail 1.4.3, running on FreeBSD-current. I've had this problem before, and i posted a message here. The author said he would fix this, but it seem the problem is still not resolved. This is the error i get: --- ERROR : Connection dropp...
2007 Aug 17
2
Help in starting spamassassin
...is what I am seeing in the maillog: Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z sendmail[13082]: l7HIdvGf013082: Milter add: header: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on\n\tz9m9z.htt-consult.com Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 40454 Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody at /usr/bin/spamd line 1161, <GEN10> line 4. Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
...02 flac-0.10/src/flac/Makefile.in -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 207 2001-05-31 04:09:11 flac-0.10/src/flac/Makefile.am -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 7484 2001-03-29 17:19:24 flac-0.10/src/flac/analyze.c -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 19373 2001-05-09 17:39:57 flac-0.10/src/flac/decode.c -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 40454 2001-05-31 03:56:36 flac-0.10/src/flac/encode.c -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 24316 2001-05-27 14:35:38 flac-0.10/src/flac/main.c -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 1147 2001-03-29 17:19:24 flac-0.10/src/flac/analyze.h -rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 1219 2001-03-16 16:59:40 flac-0.10/src/flac/decode.h -rw-rw-r-- 1000...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the > > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as > > beta 10. > > What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable > distribution? >