Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "40454".
Did you mean:
4044
2005 Mar 10
1
Errors when searching large folders
I am getting errors from dovecot when trying to search, in large Maildir
folders. The folder has 40454 messages and is 371MB in size. The email
client is squirrelmail 1.4.3, running on FreeBSD-current. I've had this
problem before, and i posted a message here. The author said he would fix
this, but it seem the problem is still not resolved.
This is the error i get:
---
ERROR : Connection dropp...
2007 Aug 17
2
Help in starting spamassassin
...is what I am seeing in the maillog:
Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z sendmail[13082]: l7HIdvGf013082: Milter add:
header: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13)
on\n\tz9m9z.htt-consult.com
Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: connection from
localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 40454
Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded
Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]: spamd: still running as root: user
not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody
at /usr/bin/spamd line 1161, <GEN10> line 4.
Aug 17 14:39:59 z9m9z spamd[13032]...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
...02 flac-0.10/src/flac/Makefile.in
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 207 2001-05-31 04:09:11 flac-0.10/src/flac/Makefile.am
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 7484 2001-03-29 17:19:24 flac-0.10/src/flac/analyze.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 19373 2001-05-09 17:39:57 flac-0.10/src/flac/decode.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 40454 2001-05-31 03:56:36 flac-0.10/src/flac/encode.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 24316 2001-05-27 14:35:38 flac-0.10/src/flac/main.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 1147 2001-03-29 17:19:24 flac-0.10/src/flac/analyze.h
-rw-rw-r-- 1000/1000 1219 2001-03-16 16:59:40 flac-0.10/src/flac/decode.h
-rw-rw-r-- 1000...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the
> > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as
> > beta 10.
>
> What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable
> distribution?
>