search for: 402m

...primarycache all local rpool/swap primarycache metadata local ./arcstat.pl (last few lines before the system locks up): Time read miss miss% dmis dm% pmis pm% mmis mm% arcsz c 15:56:34 121K 247 0 243 0 4 0 178 1 151M 402M 15:56:35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 137M 402M 15:56:36 14K 25 0 25 0 0 0 24 0 265M 402M 15:56:37 381K 575 0 575 0 0 0 574 1 4G 402M 15:56:38 362K 706 0 706 0 0 0 706 1 9G 402M 15:56:3...

...nted on udev 10M 0 10M 0% /dev tmpfs 803M 8.6M 795M 2% /run */dev/xvda1 7.4G 1.7G 5.4G 24% /* tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 402M 0 402M 0% /run/user/0 On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:05:56 -0300 > Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > > > win7 machine with RSAT Tools. > > > > The secur...

Hi, df -h output: root at ubuntu:/home/ubuntu/Downloads/asterisk-11.2.1# df -h S.ficheros Tam. Usado Disp. % Uso Montado en /cow 14G 4,5G 8,7G 34% / udev 999M 4,0K 999M 1% /dev tmpfs 403M 860K 402M 1% /run /dev/sdb1 799M 693M 106M 87% /cdrom /dev/loop0 668M 668M 0 100% /rofs tmpfs 1006M 44K 1006M 1% /tmp none 5,0M 0 5,0M 0% /run/lock none 1006M 100K 1006M 1% /run/shm Jordi...

...tmpfs 803M 8.6M 795M 2% /run > > */dev/xvda1 7.4G 1.7G 5.4G 24% /* > > tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm > > tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock > > tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup > > tmpfs 402M 0 402M 0% /run/user/0 > > > > I have a feeling that may be the problem, try creating another share > that is actually directly on the Samba server, perhaps something > in /home and then see if you get a security tab on the windows machine. > > Rowland > > -- &gt...

Rowland, AD: 4.5.8 Fileserver: 4.6.3 root at fileserver:~# samba -Version Version 4.6.3-Debian root at fileserver:~# net rpc rights list privileges SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -U "ADDC\administrator" Enter ADDC\administrator's password: SeDiskOperatorPrivilege: ADDC\Domain Admins BUILTIN\Administrators chown root:Domain\ Admins /mnt/dados >>>> ok chmod 0770

...| of data) |---cut--- | last pid: 29187; load averages: 1.82, 1.06, 0.68 18:21:36 | 82 processes: 2 running, 80 sleeping | CPU states: 93.5% user, 0.0% nice, 6.1% system, 0.4% interrupt, 0.0% idle | Mem: 82M Active, 5692K Inact, 31M Wired, 4572K Cache, 8349K Buf, 616K Free | Swap: 512M Total, 402M Used, 110M Free, 79% Inuse, 5412K In, 748K Out | PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND | 29176 www -18 0 392M 85612K swread 0:57 6.83% 6.83% httpd |---cut--- Ben Laurie (team Apache) <ben@ALGROUP.CO.UK> responded swift: | And here''s a ba...

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...| of data) |---cut--- | last pid: 29187; load averages: 1.82, 1.06, 0.68 18:21:36 | 82 processes: 2 running, 80 sleeping | CPU states: 93.5% user, 0.0% nice, 6.1% system, 0.4% interrupt, 0.0% idle | Mem: 82M Active, 5692K Inact, 31M Wired, 4572K Cache, 8349K Buf, 616K Free | Swap: 512M Total, 402M Used, 110M Free, 79% Inuse, 5412K In, 748K Out | PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND | 29176 www -18 0 392M 85612K swread 0:57 6.83% 6.83% httpd |---cut--- Ben Laurie (team Apache) <ben@ALGROUP.CO.UK> responded swift: | And here's a band-ai...