search for: 40.09

The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.6 branch passes all of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks built with its gfortran. The results compare as follows... Compile Command : gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n benchmark gcc-4.2.4 llvm-gcc-svn llvm-gcc-2.6 llvm-gcc-2.6 at -m32 20081031 -m32 at -m32 at -m64 ac 18.30

Dear all I have this table > dput(mat) mat <- structure(c(2, 16, 9, 2, 16, 1, 1, 4, 7, 7, 44.52, 42.8, 43.54, 40.26, 40.09), dim = c(5L, 3L)) And I want to calculate result for contour or image plots as I did few years ago. However interp does not compute the z values and gives me zeros in z matrix. library(akima) > interp(mat[,1], mat[,2], mat[, 3], nx=5, ny=5) $x [1] 2.0 5.5

The akima package has a problematic license (it doesn't allow commercial use), so it's been recommended that people use the interp package instead. When I use interp::interp instead of akima::interp, I get reasonable output from your example. So that's another reason to drop akima... Duncan Murdoch On 26/01/2023 9:35 a.m., PIKAL Petr wrote: > Dear all > > I have this

Hi all, I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981).  Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: clang (run id = 27):  clang -O3 pollyBasic (run id = 28):  clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGen (run id = 29):  pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none

With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg plugin... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 8 Apr 2011 19:52:56 Test Name :

On 08/10/2013 06:59 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981). Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. Hi Star Tan, thanks for the update. > There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: > clang (run id = 27): clang -O3 > pollyBasic (run id =

At 2013-08-12 01:18:30,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 08/10/2013 06:59 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981).  Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. > >Hi Star Tan, > >thanks for the update. >

Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on those where it does much better than dragonegg? Ciao, Duncan. > With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 > applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg

Hi, I need some help with running a recursive function. I like to run funlp2 recursively. When I try to run recursive function in another function named "calclp" I get this "Error: any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 is not TRUE". I have never built a recursive function before so having trouble executing it in this case. I would appreciate any help or guidance to resolve this issue.

You seem to have a typo at this expression (and some others like it) Namely, you write any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 when you possibly meant to write !( any(dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 ) i.e. I think your ! seems to be in the wrong place. HTH, Eric On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:26 PM, DIGHE, NILESH [AG/2362] < nilesh.dighe at monsanto.com> wrote: > Hi, I need some help with running a

My own typo ... whoops ... !( any(dat2$norm_sd >= 1 )) On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > You seem to have a typo at this expression (and some others like it) > > Namely, you write > > any(!dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 > > when you possibly meant to write > > !( any(dat2$norm_sd) >= 1 ) > > i.e. I think your !

Hi, I accidently left out few lines of code from the calclp function. Updated function is pasted below. I am still getting the same error ?Error: !(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1)) is not TRUE? I would appreciate any help. Nilesh dput(calclp) function (dataset) { dat1 <- funlp1(dataset) recursive_funlp <- function(dataset = dat1, func = funlp2) { dat2 <- dataset %>%

Eric: Thanks for taking time to look into my problem. Despite of making the change you suggested, I am still getting the same error. I am wondering if the logic I am using in the stopifnot and if functions is a problem. I like the recursive function to stop whenever the norm_sd column has zero values that are above or equal to 1. Below is the calclp function after the changes you suggested.

The message is coming from your stopifnot() condition being met. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:31 PM, DIGHE, NILESH [AG/2362] < nilesh.dighe at monsanto.com> wrote: > Hi, I accidently left out few lines of code from the calclp function. > Updated function is pasted below. > > I am still getting the same error ?Error: !(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1)) is > not TRUE? > > >

If you are trying to understand why the "stopifnot" condition is met you can replace it by something like: if ( any(dat2$norm_sd >= 1) ) browser() This will put you in a debugging session where you can examine your variables, e.g. > dat$norm_sd HTH, Eric On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> wrote: > The message is coming from

Eric: I will try and see if I can figure out the issue by debugging as you suggested. I don?t know why my code after stopifnot is not getting executed where I like the code to run the funlp2 function when the if statement is TRUE but when it is false, I like it to keep running until the stopifnot condition is met. When the stopifnot condition is met, I like to get the output from if statement

Your code contains the lines stopifnot(!(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1))) if (!(any(data1$norm_sd >= 1))) { df1 <- dat1 return(df1) } stop() "throws an error", causing the current function and all functions in the call stack to abort and return nothing. It does not mean to stop now and return a result. Does the function give