Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2418 matches for "4.8".
Did you mean:
0.8
2016 Aug 01
0
[GPUCC] link against libdevice
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your response! The clang & llvm I'm using was built from
source.
Below is the output of compiling with -v. Any suggestions would be
appreciated!
*clang version 3.9.0 (trunk 270145) (llvm/trunk 270133)*
*Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu*
*Thread model: posix*
*InstalledDir: /usr/local/bin*
*Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8*
2016 Aug 01
3
[GPUCC] link against libdevice
OK, I see the problem. You were right that we weren't picking up libdevice.
CUDA 7.0 only ships with the following libdevice binaries (found
/path/to/cuda/nvvm/libdevice):
libdevice.compute_20.10.bc libdevice.compute_30.10.bc
libdevice.compute_35.10.bc
If you ask for sm_50 with cuda 7.0, clang can't find a matching
libdevice binary, and it will apparently silently give up and try to
2016 Aug 01
2
[GPUCC] link against libdevice
Hi, Yuanfeng.
What version of clang are you using? CUDA is only known to work at
tip of head, so you must build clang yourself from source.
I suspect that's your problem, but if building from source doesn't fix
it, please attach the output of compiling with -v.
Regards,
-Justin
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Directly
2016 Mar 05
2
instrumenting device code with gpucc
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Yuanfeng Peng <yuanfeng.jack.peng at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jingyue,
>
> My name is Yuanfeng Peng, I'm a PhD student at UPenn. I'm sorry to bother
> you, but I'm having trouble with gpucc in my project, and I would be really
> grateful for your help!
>
> Currently we're trying to instrument CUDA code using LLVM 3.9, and
2015 May 07
2
Problems installing packages with R 3.2.0 on Linux Mint 17.1
Dear R-SIG-Debians,
I have difficulties installing packages from within R through
install.packages(). R version is 3.2.0 and OS is Linux Mint 17.1.
For most packages, a lot of error messages come up which seem to be
related to compilation. Installing packages provided by the ubuntu
distro through apt-get works just fine.
I followed all directions given in CRAN's
2003 Apr 14
1
updating from 4.8-RELEASED to 4.8-STABLE
hi to all FreeBSD user. i have a problem about
updating from 4.8-RELEASED to 4.8-STABLE, here's
exactly what i did:
first: cvsup -g -L 2 stable-supfile, where my
stable-supfile is located at /root.
2nd: cd /usr/src; make buildworld; make buildkernel
KERNCONF=BUFDAEMON; make installkernel
KERNCONF=BUFDAEMON
3rd: reboot; mergemaster -p; make installworld;
mergemaster; reboot.
after
2016 Jun 22
2
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering
Thanks Nirav,
I can confirm that this works when I do the compile with llc, but then when
linking to an executable with clang (patched with
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20352 and compiler-rt patched with
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21612) on Linux, I'm getting something different.
Here's a sample of the transcript, and what I'm seeing:
--->8 clang invocation 8<---
[16-06-23 3:33:42]
2005 Mar 05
2
Heads up: End of RELENG_4_8 support
At the end of March, the RELENG_4_8 (sometimes called 4.8-SECURITY)
branch will reach its designated End of Life and cease to be supported
by the FreeBSD Security Team.
Released in April 2003, FreeBSD 4.8 was the first release designated
for "extended" two-year security support instead of the normal one-year
support. Over this time, 27 security advisories have been issued which
have
2016 Dec 01
0
clang error: static_assert failed "Cache the hash code or make functors involved in hash code and bucket index computation default constructible"
Hi,
Consider below test case:
1 #include <unordered_map>
2
3 using key=const int;
4 struct Myhash {
5 Myhash() = default;
6 std::hash<int> hash_int_t;
7 inline size_t operator()(const key& x) const throw() {
8 return hash_int_t(x);
9 }
10 };
11
2003 Jul 04
1
Updating from 4.8 release to 4.8 stable
Hello,
I am very new to FreeBSD and just installed 4.8 release. I want to upgrade this to stable. I have printed some of the pages out for makeworld and CVSUP, I am wondering what the best method for doing the updates are, downloading the individual packages and installing or using the CVSUP to do this? Currently I used mostly Red Hat Linux but have wanted to give this a try for some time
2015 May 07
0
Problems installing packages with R 3.2.0 on Linux Mint 17.1
Dear Stefan,
I have no idea where the problem is, but I feel this strong urge to mention
that install.packages("sem") works fine on Debian squeeze (g++ 4.4.5), wheezy
(g++ 4.7.2) and jessie (g++ 4.9.2) using the R backport from CRAN...
Kind regards,
Johannes
Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2015, 09:39:20 schrieb Dr. Stefan R?ttger:
> Dear R-SIG-Debians,
>
> I have difficulties
2011 Feb 03
3
CentOS 4.8
Hi,
I installed CentOS 4.8 (not CentOS 5) on VMware Fusion using an ISO file I
downloaded. During the installation, it asked me to enter a user name and
its password. I tried to enter root for the user name, but it would not let
me do that. So I had to enter a non-root user name.
So I did not have the root user name and password when the installation
completed. I only had a non-privileged user
2016 Oct 18
2
Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?
Hi. I was wanting an initial opinion from the Release Team, about the
Xen packages. Currently they are in bad shape in stretch and I intend
to fix them ASAP.
The question is whether I should move to Xen 4.7, or Xen 4.8. Xen 4.8
is currently at RC2 and seems in pretty good shape. I think it's more
probable than not that we'll have Xen 4.8.0 by the Debian freeze date,
but this is by no
2016 Jun 22
0
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering
Peter suggested just writing out '.byte 0xeb, 0x09' and that allowed the
jump instruction to bypass the relaxation, so that fixes my immediate
problem. The question still stands though whether it should be possible to
do through the instruction builder interface.
Cheers
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM Dean Michael Berris <dberris at google.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Nirav,
>
>
2010 May 24
1
Installing merb - connection reset, retrying, connection reset, retrying....
This is my output. I don''t know what to do to make this work. I have
installed other gems without any problems.
Suggestions?
debian:/home/kevin# gem source -a http://www.rubygems.org
http://www.rubygems.org added to sources
debian:/home/kevin# gem install merb -V
GET 302 Found: http://gems.rubyforge.org/latest_specs.4.8.gz
GET 304 Not Modified:
2017 Feb 18
2
xen 4.7 or 4.8
Hi
are there somewhere pkgs with xen 4.7 or 4.8 for centos7?
--
----------
Greetz
Christoph
2003 Jun 19
4
SMP goes away after installworld (4.8-STABLE)
Hello,
I installed 4.8-RELEASE a few weeks ago, and since I let
the effort sit stagnant for a while I decided to do the
cvsup/buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld/mergemaster/MAKEDEV
steps to get current.
Went fine, rebooted, then noticed that just one CPU was recognized:
FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 19 17:05:20 PDT 2003
2016 Jun 22
0
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering
Hmm. Odd. I just rebuilt from scratch and it seems to work with
the test/CodeGen/X86/xray-attribute-instrumentation.ll test case outputing
straight to obj:
llc -filetype=obj -o ~/a.o -mtriple=x86_64-apple-macosx <
test/CodeGen/X86/xray-attribute-instrumentation.ll
What test case are you using?
In any case, the issue appears to be that llvm doesn't realize that the
target address is
2010 Sep 07
3
Update to base release
Hello All,
We have some machines running CentOS 4 Update 4 (4.4). We want to update
these boxes to the stock CentOS 4 Update 8 (4.8).
We have the 4.8 iso images. Is it possible to use up2date and have it use
the 4.8 mounted iso images on a remote (install) server as the repository?
The ISO's are accessible through http. These servers are remote with no
CD/DVD option to upgrade that way.
I have
2016 Oct 19
2
Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?
On 19/10/16 16:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Xen in stretch - 4.7 or 4.8 ?"):
>> Hi. I was wanting an initial opinion from the Release Team, about the
>> Xen packages. Currently they are in bad shape in stretch and I intend
>> to fix them ASAP.
>>
>> The question is whether I should move to Xen 4.7, or Xen 4.8.
>
> I just asked