search for: 4.6.5

Hai,   I've created the samba Debian Stretch packages and are available through my apt. This wil make Debian Jessie to Stretch upgrade more easy if you use my packages.   More info at : apt.van-belle.nl and in short:   - use stretch-backports if you want the current debian testing (buster) packages. (debian 4.6.5-2)  ( No changes make to packages, a one on one rebuild ) - use stretch if

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:3070 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3070 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8a8b7a2282d2e5c826b3b67e1ce2e406b73e36feb1d954aa74ee0c6af0a31837 ipa-client-4.6.5-11.el7.centos.3.x86_64.rpm

Hello Samba experts, I have just successfully replaced the old default Thecus Samba version 3.5.16 on my Thecus NAS (32-bit Intel Atom, 3 GB RAM, i686 Thecus kernel 2.6.33) by a current Samba 4.6.5 build that I have cross-compiled myself from scratch. Note that so far, I am using the unchanged (i.e. exactly identical) old 3.5.16 smb.conf file for 4.6.5. Everything seems to work fine in

Hello Jeremy, thanks a million for your help and interest in tracking this down! :-) Am 13.06.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > Can you get comparitive wireshark traces for the two cases ? > > That would help discover what the bottleneck is. I am not at all a network guy, but I hope that - maybe with a little more help from your part once I have tried to do so in practice - I

Hello, I've made a mistake. The subject is the newest samba version : 4.6.5 Thanks for all Serge Le 16/06/2017 à 12:15, "> L.P.H. van Belle via samba (par Internet, dépôt samba-bounces at lists.samba.org)" a écrit : > Hai, > > Your subject suggest 3.6.5, see you did mean 4.6.5 > > I suggest you have a look here > http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > > And if you

Hi, Last evening we upgraded one of our 4 Domain Controllers from 4.6.5 to 4.7.1 and all of a sudden the DNS resolution issue started. We are using BIND9_DLZ back end. This server we had upgraded has all 7 FSMO Roles. Some time back we upgraded the other 3 servers from version 4.6.5 to 4.7.1 and there was no issue at all. I have also observed a very peculiar behaviour that is all of a

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:09:41PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello Samba experts, > > I have just successfully replaced the old default Thecus Samba > version 3.5.16 on my Thecus NAS (32-bit Intel Atom, 3 GB RAM, i686 > Thecus kernel 2.6.33) by a current Samba 4.6.5 build that I have > cross-compiled myself from scratch. > > Note that so far, I am using the unchanged

On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:30:32 -0300 Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Samba 4.6.5 and I have installed as follows: > > wget -c https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/samba-4.6.5.tar.gz > > tar -xzvf samba-4.6.5.tar.gz > > cd samba-4.6.5 > > ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest Why ? you

Hai, http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/ Is updated also. Added: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Buildlogs/ with all .build and .changes files. Added: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Patches/ with the applied patches in the jessie and unstable line (4.5.10 and/or 4.6.5). See the .changes files Added: http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Kyocera/ containing a pcl5 kyocera printer

Hello again, Jeremy, first of all, I am terribly sorry for my late reply. I tried to send my posting many times, but my mail has always been silently discarded by the Samba mail servers due to my main mail provider (GMX - a very large German mail provider with millions of customers) having been blacklisted by SORBS. For the time being, SORBS is still unwilling to delist them for unknown

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as

Buen día Agradeciendo de antemano a mi consulta Cual es el procedimiento correcto o que pasos debo de seguir para realizar un respaldode Usuarios,Grupos,Computadores  y Politicas alojadas en un Servidor Samba 4 que actua como PDC - AD, a otro recién instaldo Samba 4.6.1 -> 4.6.5 (over  Ubuntu Server 16.04 x86_64) Gracias Good day Thanking you in advance for my inquiry What is the correct

Hai, I've (finaly) complete and restructured my apt. All non-samba related packages are removed, so it all dedicated for samba. More Info about my apt found here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ The apt repo has the following setup. All term like (jessie) and (jessie-backports) and (unstable) are related to this apt repo (apt.van-belle.nl), but everything is builded and tested on Debian

Hi, I'm using Samba 4.6.5 and I have installed as follows: wget -c https://download.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/samba-4.6.5.tar.gz tar -xzvf samba-4.6.5.tar.gz cd samba-4.6.5 ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest make make install It seems that is working properly, however I can't create or update GPO with Windows Group Policy Management tool. When I try, "Denied

Hello everyone, I'm having a hard time getting samba 4.6.5 to return the quota to Windows clients. samba has been compiled with quota-support: /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep 'QUOTA' HAVE_SYS_QUOTAS HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H HAVE_RPCSVC_RQUOTA_H HAVE_GETQUOTA_RSLT_GETQUOTA_RSLT_U HAVE_NFS_QUOTAS HAVE_QUOTACTL_LINUX WITH_QUOTAS However the client shows the

hello, When I compil the samba new version samba 3.6.5, on Debian jessie 8.8, most of the time I've got an error message. I can compile without problems samba 3.6.4 on the running servers. It doesn't happen on a fresh install Thanks for your help, - serge. 'configure' finished successfully (1m56.906s) WAF_MAKE=1 python ./buildtools/bin/waf build Waf: Entering directory

Hi, The upgrade from 4.6.5 broke all the servers. Although the services were running and there is no error message, DNS resolution failed. Even from inside the domain controllers, DNS queries failed. Samba Version 4.7.1 and Named Version 9.9.4. The same issue happened with samba version 4.7.3 and 4.7.4 We had to revert back to 4.6.5 to bring the servers back online. Now I have few

thanks for all your work I tried to upgrade my test VM to variant 2, so I have 4.5.10 now. I get pid_to_procid: messaging_dgm_get_unique failed: No such file or directory when testing with smbclient -L localhost -U% apt-cache policy samba samba: Installiert: 2:4.5.10+dfsg-1nmu1 Installationskandidat: 2:4.5.10+dfsg-1nmu1 Versionstabelle: *** 2:4.5.10+dfsg-1nmu1 0 500

Hi. I'm trying to delete a machine account using pdbedit -x -m and it fails. Any idea why that might happen? The machine account exists.. # pdbedit -Lv 'ts$' Unix username: TS$ NT username: Account Flags: [W ] User SID: S-1-5-21-2594621239-3917873753-3682423317-3286 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-2594621239-3917873753-3682423317-515 Full Name: Home Directory:

Le Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:25:55 +0200 LE GARREC Serge - DDPP 50/SIDSIC via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Hello, > > I've made a mistake. The subject is the newest samba version : 4.6.5 > This version is marked "rc-buggy" in Debian Experimental. This means that it doesn't compile easily on Debian sid at the moment, so it's no surprise that it