Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "4.4029".
Did you mean:
4.402
2005 Sep 26
4
p-level in packages mgcv and gam
Hi,
I am fairly new to GAM and started using package mgcv. I like the
fact that optimal smoothing is automatically used (i.e. df are not
determined a priori but calculated by the gam procedure).
But the mgcv manual warns that p-level for the smooth can be
underestimated when df are estimated by the model. Most of the time
my p-levels are so small that even doubling them would not result