search for: 4.11

Package: xen-utils-4.11 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, We have discovered that the `pygrub` binaries, expected under `/usr/lib/xen-4.11/bin`, are no longer present in the xen-utils-4.11 package. Reviewing the source package reveals that the binary is still present under `tools/pygrub/src/pygrub`, however it is not referenced anywhere obvious in the package build configurations, nor is

At the end of March, the RELENG_4_8 (sometimes called 4.8-SECURITY) branch will reach its designated End of Life and cease to be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Released in April 2003, FreeBSD 4.8 was the first release designated for "extended" two-year security support instead of the normal one-year support. Over this time, 27 security advisories have been issued which have

I was just looking at https://apt.van-belle.nl/ and see that the packages for samba 4.11 and up only appear to be available for Debian 10. Does that imply/state that Debian 10 is required for the newer samba releases starting with 4.11? -- Marco

xen source: lintian output: 'license-problem-gfdl-invariants stubdom/grub.patches/00cvs invariant part is: with no invariant sections, with the front-cover texts being a gnu manual, and with the back-cover texts as in (a) below', automatically rejected package. xen source: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. xen-utils-4.11: lintian output:

On 04/11/2020 21:05, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 04.11.20 um 21:59 schrieb Marco Shmerykowsky via samba: >> I was just looking at https://apt.van-belle.nl/ and >> see that the packages for samba 4.11 and up only >> appear to be available for Debian 10. >> >> Does that imply/state that Debian 10 is required for the >> newer samba releases

Hello, After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out so it's not just my setup? How to reproduce: 1. Mount a Samba 4.11 share using the mount command: mount //server1/share /tmp/share1 2. Run python script that is using mkstemp: import

I've noticed that the current version in the repos for Ubuntu is 4.7.6. I've tried to find a ppa that might have the latest release but can't find it. Does anyone know where I might. I really don't want to compile samba from scratch if possible. Thanks. -- Stephen Atkins

Hai, The folder test-suite/buildtests/ Is an not exiting folder in current 4.11 tar.gz Can you verify that? I thinks thats also from 5.x Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: squid-users > [mailto:squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org] Namens > Amos Jeffries > Verzonden: donderdag 23 april 2020 14:28 > Aan: squid-users at

Gooooooood morning guys,? ? EVERYBODY READY... !??? :who hoo.. i am..? :-) ? Finaly the first 4.11 builds are getting in shape and pff,?a hard cookie this one.. but with some help and determination... deb are created now.. ? If everything goes as aspected now, you might see TODAY the 4.11 packages.? (fingers crossed) ... Now running lintian samba_4.11.0+dfsg-0.1_amd64.changes ... And i have

Hello Louis, Yes, I do talk about join a 2012 Windows server as a secondary AD-DC, my bad, I wasn't clear enough here. About Samba version, we can assume that it's a Samba 4.11 with 2012 schema. That's quite a good news here, I will test ASAP. I just wanted to know it anybody had problems beforehand; Thanks a lot :) Am?lie Am?lie LE JEUNE, Technicienne syst?mes et r?seaux

Hello all, Is it possible to join a 2012 Windows Server to a Samba 4.11 Domain ? We know there's issue by 2012 Windows Server because there's a wmi request before attempt to join domain. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD But 4.11 can have a 2012 schema, isn't it ? So, does the issue is solved by emulating a wmi request or

Hello... In regards to http://www.freebsd.org/security/ , from what I understand the FreeBSD 4.x branch is generally winding down in favor of the 5.x/6.x branches. It would be nice to know ahead of time if 4.11 will also be an extended release, or if that would fall to 4.12. For those of running 4.8 (expiring about the same time as 4.11 is released) we would be in a better position to know

Hai, Well.. :-(( no.. Not yet. Boehoee :-( There are multiple things still going on which needs to be fixed first. Today i fixed a few more, and a new test build is currently running (again).. Pff. Done over 30 test builds already... And we are still finding more things atm. So i have to hold on with the 'almost', well its almost but time wise, I cant say anything atm. Sorry,

We're adding a new datacenter and am taking the opportunity to upgrade Samba version to 4.11. We have three AD servers currently on version 4.7.9.? I plan to add a new AD DC, version 4.11, by joining it to the domain. Can the domain function in production with three DCs on 4.7.9, and a new one running 4.11 ? Thanks,-Mike

Hi, The HP ZBook 15 G3 laptop builtin display (eDP-1) does not work correctly with v4.11-11413-g2868b25. When booting the laptop, the resolution seems to be limited to 1024x768, and gnome-session segfaults. Up to 4.11 the display works just fine in 1920x1080 mode. I'm seeing this in the kernel logs: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: eDP-1: EDID is invalid: [00] BAD 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 ff

While attempting to troubleshoot a problem with PCI passthrough, I noticed a number of facts that, when considered together, may indicate a serious upgrade path issue with regard to Xen and QEMU: 1. libxen-dev is a single package with two versions: a 4.8 version and a 4.11 version 2. libxen-dev version 4.8 produces libraries with 4.8 in the soname. A qemu compiled against this version has

Hello, with the packages from Louis it works fantastic. Here at work and at home i use Debain 10 with the latest packages from Louis and have i Windows Server 2012 join as a AD-DC. Here is the link of the Samba Wiki that i use to make it happen: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows_2012_Server_compatibility#2012_and_2012_R2_Windows_DC Regards Dirk Am 22.11.19 um 14:16 schrieb Am?lie

On 16/11/2020 10:34, Piviul via samba wrote: > Piviul via samba ha scritto il 04/11/20 alle 14:15: >> [...] >> Someone knows why %J variable substitution is performed before the >> print command variable substitution? > I've found that on debian bullseye (samba version 4.12.5) the %J macro > is expanded correctly so I argue that it's a bug solved on recent

Can you please post your smb.conf? On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:45 PM Kacper via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python > scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs > mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out > so it's not just my setup? >

On 21/09/2019 17:43, Kacper via samba wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python > scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs > mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out > so it's not just my setup? > > How to reproduce: > 1. Mount a Samba 4.11 share using the mount command: