search for: 4.10

Hello. I'm not 100% sure if this is a configuration error on my side or a 'bad idea' on sshd/FreeBSD sides. A remote root ssh connection to a FreeBSD 4.10 server (with no remote root access) will allow you to 'work out' the root password. However, if you try the same against 5.2.1 FreeBSD, you have little chance. The following are pretty clear examples. If this is a config

Hello, from SAMBA 4.9/4.10 there was a big change regarding CTDB. Does anyone have an example configuration, how to configure a CTDB cluster from version 4.10? Is there someone who run CTDB with SAMBA 4.10? Best regards Micha

So far I tested PXELINUX from 4.10-pre12, 4.10-pre9 and 4.10-pre6. The first two take a long time with a TFTP file not found and eventually find my file but error out (presumably to kaboom). The last takes a long time, does a lot of retransmitted packets (didn't watch the first two), then eventually loads the file but continues this behavior for TFTP and HTTP transfers. This is on VMware

Has anyone else seen chkrootkit (version 0.43) on 4.10-prerelease or later report chfn, chsh, and date as infected? I built world yesterday, and my nightly chkrootkit reports this on run. I've replaced the binaries with their 4.9 equivalents, and things don't report as infected. I upgrade the 4.9 machine to 4.10, and chkrootkit reports them as infected again. Is this similar to the

Hi, I finally managed to test pxelinux 4.10 pre17 in our VMware environment and can report that HTTP booting seems to work reliably now. Downloads are fairly fast. As a side note, rosh "ls" and "pwd" commands now work as expected with a HTTP TFTP prefix, cool! I'll leave it in production use now and report about any further issues. Can you already tell when a 4.10

yes, I read https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.10.0.html and http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Upgrade-info.txt - Are there any particular things to consider when upgrading from 4.9.x to 4.10.x ? Talking of 2 DCs and 2 DMs here, debian-based. I assume it's better to only do the step to 4.10.x first and not to 4.11.x ? At first the DMs, then one DC ... ? thanks for any

Dear folks, I'm recently investigating large scale deployment and upgrading FreeBSD RELEASE. It's our tradition to bump "RELEASE-pN" after a security patch is applied, however, it seems that there is less method to determine whether the userland is patched, which is somewhat important for large site managements. So is "uname -sr" the only way to differencate the

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:54:07PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:25:12AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > > Hi, Michael & Herbert > > > > Because the virtio-crypto device emulation had been in QEMU 2.8, > > would you please merge the virtio-crypto driver for 4.10 if no other > > comments? If so, Miachel pls ack and/or review the patch,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:54:07PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:25:12AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > > Hi, Michael & Herbert > > > > Because the virtio-crypto device emulation had been in QEMU 2.8, > > would you please merge the virtio-crypto driver for 4.10 if no other > > comments? If so, Miachel pls ack and/or review the patch,

Hello everybody, setting up a netboot server for a really huge network I decided to go with what will be syslinux 4.10 to get support for http transfers. The setup works on my notebook, booting another notebook directly connected. However it fails with a more complex setup: A virtual machine on the second notebook bridged to the ethernet device does not boot, systems from other networks with a

I'd like to share the results of a little experiment I did yesterday. On an Arch Linux box on which in December I tried, and failed, to upgrade from 4.7.4. to 4.9.4 and then had to revert back to 4.7.4, yesterday I did the upgrade to the new 4.10 release. This time, everything worked, I had no errors whatsoever. So, I then made a backup of the new installation, in 3 different ways: Online

Hi All, I would like to do a test lab using SAMBA 4.10 AD DS with BIND DLZ. I would like to use a linux distro and one that I can use Linux packages. I do not want to compile from source and would like the samba and bind to be packages that update with the OS. It seems that SAMBA 4.10 is "new" so that some distros are behind and running 4.8. What are my options? Is SAMBA installed

Hai Stefan, Yes, i do recommend the setup from 4.9 to 4.10 first. If you plan is to upgrade to buster. 1) on stretch, update samba to 4.10 2) Change apt sources do buster, * your now also able to add buster-samba411 of my repo. 3) apt-get dist upgrade --autoremove --purge And you able to upgrade to buster and samba 4.11. Do note, i should be possible to to it also from 4.9 to 4.11, but

Hi Ian, can you please review and sponsor the upload of a first Xen 4.10 package to experimental? The work which has been done to arrive at this point from the previous 4.8 packages is visible at: https://salsa.debian.org/xen-team/debian-xen/commits/master The only commit which is not in master yet is the actual package release:

Hi Ian, after our conversation on IRC in #debian-xen today, I updated the packaging to the latest 4.10-stable commit (since there's no 4.10.1 release yet) and smoke-tested the package on a testing/unstable dom0 running a PVHv2 guest. Can you please review and sponsor the upload of a first Xen 4.10 package to Debian unstable? The work which has been done to arrive at this point from the

4.10 is not yet in the repo. almost..  im preparing for it. i think next week. Greetz, Louis Op 29 mrt. 2019, om 21:28, Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> schreef: Hi Louis, I see that you already offer 4.10 in your repo for Stretch. Would be great if you could make it available for Bionic, too. Thanks. - Viktor

Hi Viktor, In 4.10.0, the fix for https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13760 will take effect when the samba process first starts. In theory, if you take a backup after this, that backup database should no longer have bug 13760 in it. It seems like what you're seeing might be a different problem. If samba_dnsupdate isn't working, then DNS may well not work. And if DNS isn't

I've noticed the 14 pre versions of 4.10, but then there is now a new 4.05 pre? ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/boot/syslinux/Testing/ Wondering? +----------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor Guam Community College Computer Center mailto:mikes at kuentos.guam.net

Especially you who are doing large-scale network booting, please try out 4.10-pre17 *and report the results*. I'm hoping with Gene Cumm's fixes that we have can promote this to a full release shortly, but I really need test reports -- good or bad. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

Hi, When I use "samba-tool user syncpasswords" in Samba 4.10.11 (and earlier version of 4.10), I get a python exception coming from a place in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/user.py I could fix it with this patch: diff user.py.orig user.py 2001c2001 < reply = sync_command_p.communicate(input)[0] --- > reply =