Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "3fe4ea6".
Did you mean:
3d94ea6
2015 Jul 03
4
boot... round 2
Hi,
Adam Williamson
> I think it would be better if someone else confirms there's actually
> something to fix.
There was indeed the shortcomming that byte values 128 to 255
were treated as whitespace and mapped to "_" resp. "".
This would affect non-ASCII characters of UTF-8 or old
ISO-8859.
But the reason why gcc 5 made a difference to gcc 4.9
is not found yet.