Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "3f697c8c8205".
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH v11 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions
...FORM)) {
+ dev_warn(&dev->dev,
+ "device must provide VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ }
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index 8fe857e27ef3..3f697c8c8205 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -540,4 +540,14 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
virtio_cread_le((vdev), structname, member, ptr); \
_r; \
})
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
+i...
2020 Sep 10
0
[PATCH v12 1/2] virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions
...FORM)) {
+ dev_warn(&dev->dev,
+ "device must provide VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ }
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index 8fe857e27ef3..3f697c8c8205 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -540,4 +540,14 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
virtio_cread_le((vdev), structname, member, ptr); \
_r; \
})
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS
+i...
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v12 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
I changed VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
I forgot in drivers/virtio/Kconfig, and put back the inclusion
of virtio_config.h for the definition of the callback in
arch/s390/mm/init.c I wrongly removed in the last series.
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
virtio: let
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v12 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
I changed VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
I forgot in drivers/virtio/Kconfig, and put back the inclusion
of virtio_config.h for the definition of the callback in
arch/s390/mm/init.c I wrongly removed in the last series.
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
virtio: let
2020 Sep 07
8
[PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features.
No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports
if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for
VIRTIO.
I renamed the callback to arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access,
the config option to
2020 Sep 07
8
[PATCH v11 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
The tests are back to virtio_finalize_features.
No more argument for the architecture callback which only reports
if the architecture needs guest memory access restrictions for
VIRTIO.
I renamed the callback to arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access,
the config option to