Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "3f4117adf311".
2020 Jul 07
3
[PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...return ret;
>
> + ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> _r; \
> })
>
> +int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
> #endif /* _...
2020 Jul 07
3
[PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...return ret;
>
> + ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> _r; \
> })
>
> +int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
> #endif /* _...
2020 Jul 09
4
[PATCH v5 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch
@Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed
please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) I suppressed the unnecessary verbosity of the architecture
specific
2020 Jul 07
5
[PATCH v4 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
I changed the patch subject to reflect the content, becoming more
general.
1) I removed the ack from Christian and Jason even far as
I understand they gave it for the functionality more than for the
implementation.
@Jason, @Christian, please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) previous patch had another name:
[PATCH v3 0/1] s390: virtio: let arch choose to
2020 Jul 07
0
[PATCH v4 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...e_features(struct virtio_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
_r; \
})
+int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
#endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
--
2.25.1
2020 Jul 09
0
[PATCH v5 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...e_features(struct virtio_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
_r; \
})
+int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
#endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
--
2.25.1
2020 Jul 09
1
[PATCH v5 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...return ret;
>
> + ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> _r; \
> })
>
> +int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
> #endif /* _...
2020 Jul 15
0
[PATCH v7 1/2] virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
...e_features(struct virtio_device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = arch_validate_virtio_features(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (!virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
index bb4cc4910750..3f4117adf311 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -459,4 +459,5 @@ static inline void virtio_cwrite64(struct virtio_device *vdev,
_r; \
})
+int arch_validate_virtio_features(struct virtio_device *dev);
#endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
--
2.25.1
2020 Jul 14
4
[PATCH v6 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch
@Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed
please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) Rewording for warning messages
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):
2020 Jul 15
5
[PATCH v7 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Hi all,
The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
to validate VIRTIO device features.
in this respin:
1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch
@Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed
please can I get back your acked-by with these changes?
2) Rewording for warning messages
Regards,
Pierre
Pierre Morel (2):