search for: 3eac4b9

...S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> --- arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h | 25 ++----------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h index 752e0b8..3eac4b9 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ #include <asm/addrspace.h> -#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) -#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) - #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_SYNC #define __sync() \ __as...

...S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> --- arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h | 25 ++----------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h index 752e0b8..3eac4b9 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ #include <asm/addrspace.h> -#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) -#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) - #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_SYNC #define __sync() \ __as...

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who said > You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into > sort-of functional state. This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone? Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please? Note to arch maintainers: please don't

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v2: - extended checkpatch tests for barriers, and added patches teaching it to warn about incorrect usage of barriers (__smp_xxx barriers are for use by asm-generic code only), should help prevent misuse by arch code to address comments by Russell King - patched more instances of xen to use virt_ barriers as suggested by Stefano Stabellini - implemented a 2 byte xchg on sh

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the

Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the