Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "3e55ff9b".
2016 Jan 20
2
Adding support for self-modifying branches to LLVM?
...rick LLVM into laying out basic blocks the right way (and not eliminating
those that are unreachable due to not-yet-transformed branches).
Cheers,
Jonas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160120/3e55ff9b/attachment.html>
2016 Jan 19
4
Adding support for self-modifying branches to LLVM?
Hi,
I’m thinking about using LLVM to implement a limited form of self-modifying
code. Before diving into that, I’d like to get some feedback from you all.
*The goal:* I’d like to add “optional” code to a program that I can enable
at runtime and that has zero (i.e., as close to zero as I can get) overhead
when not enabled.
*Existing solutions:* Currently, I can guard optional code using a