Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "3e44i".
Did you mean:
3e4i
2010 Mar 25
2
print(big+small*1i) -> big + 0i
Should both parts of a complex number be printed
to the same precision? The imaginary part of 0
looks a bit odd when log10(real/imag) >=~ getOption("digits"),
but I'm not sure it is awful. Some people might
expect the same number of significant digits in the
two parts.
> 1e7+4i
[1] 10000000+0i
> 1e7+5i
[1] 10000000+0i
> 1e10 + 1000i
[1] 1e+10+0e+00i
>
2006 Oct 03
1
R-2.4.0 is released
...n a function call in
the wrong scope (from the body of nls).
o Printing of complex numbers could misbehave when one of the
parts was large (so scientific notation was used) and the
other was so much smaller that it had no significant digits
and should have been printed as zero (e.g. 1e80+3e44i).
o Using install.packages with type="mac.binary" and target path
starting with ~ failed with a cryptic message while unpacking.
o getwd() now works correctly when the working directory is
unavailable (e.g. unreadable).
o The alternative hypothesis in wilcox.test() was la...
2006 Oct 03
1
R-2.4.0 is released
...n a function call in
the wrong scope (from the body of nls).
o Printing of complex numbers could misbehave when one of the
parts was large (so scientific notation was used) and the
other was so much smaller that it had no significant digits
and should have been printed as zero (e.g. 1e80+3e44i).
o Using install.packages with type="mac.binary" and target path
starting with ~ failed with a cryptic message while unpacking.
o getwd() now works correctly when the working directory is
unavailable (e.g. unreadable).
o The alternative hypothesis in wilcox.test() was la...