Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "3e3".
Did you mean:
33
2005 Jun 10
1
Performance difference between 32-bit build and 64-bit build on Solaris 8
...-g -02"
neither build uses a BLAS. Both builds are installed on the same
machine, and the same disk. The machine has virtually no load; R is
one of the only processes running during these timings:
First comparison: solve on a large matrix
>echo 'set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))' |
/disk/loneres01/R-2.1.0-32bit/bin/R -q --vanilla
> set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))
[1] 713.45 0.38 713.93 0.00 0.00
>
>echo 'set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))' |
/disk/loneres01/R-2.1....
2005 Jun 11
2
Performance difference between 32-bit build and 64-bit bu ild on Solaris 8
...es a BLAS. Both builds are installed on the same
> machine, and the same disk. The machine has virtually no load; R is
> one of the only processes running during these timings:
>
> First comparison: solve on a large matrix
>
> >echo 'set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))' |
> /disk/loneres01/R-2.1.0-32bit/bin/R -q --vanilla
> > set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))
> [1] 713.45 0.38 713.93 0.00 0.00
> >
>
> >echo 'set.seed(1);M<-matrix(rnorm(9e6),3e3);system.time(solve(M))...
2005 Jan 28
3
avoiding loops
Hi again,
thanks a lot for the quick answer. I just forgot the comma, always
these stupid mistakes...
Anyways, as I said before, I have two data.frames containing about 1000
rows and I would like to avoid looping through all of them...
In each data.frame are coordinates (x,y,z), so every row is giving the
information on one single point.
I would like to calculate the distance from each point
2004 Mar 25
1
yet another fast BLAS (from AMD this time)
Dear R-devel,
Has anyone played with this?
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html
<http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html>
.
I'll probably give it a shot...
Best,
Andy
Andy Liaw, PhD
Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300
Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065
mailto:andy_liaw@merck.com
2004 Apr 10
4
Automation of c()
Hi,
I have around 300 files with the x, y and z coordinates of a DEM that I
would like to join in a single data frame object. I know how to automate the
import of the 300 data frames.
in Bash
ls > names
in R
names<-scan(names...)
With rep() and data.frame() construct a series of read.table() commands,
which you write to a file and execute them with source().
I do not know however how
2003 Apr 24
0
Italian-crafted Rolex - only $65 - $140!! Free SHIPPING!! (PR#2835)
...tona =28ladies and men=A1=AFs=29=3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=3E=3C=2Fp=3E
=3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3E2=2E Blancpain=3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=3E=3C=2Fp=3E
=3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3E3=2E Fortis=3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=3E=3C=2Fp=3E
=3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3E4=2E Jaeger LeCoutre=3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=3E=3C=2Fp=3E
=3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3E5=2E Longines=...
2003 Nov 29
3
performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0
Dear R-help,
A colleague of mine was running some code on two of our boxes, and noticed a
rather large difference in running time. We've so far isolated the problem
to the difference between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0, but not more than that. The
exact same code took 933.5 seconds in 1.7.1, and 3594.4 seconds in 1.8.1, on
the same box.
Basically, the code calls boot() to bootstrap fitting mixture
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...ON__.21073+0xd>
> 3d4: 6f outsl %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> 3d5: 6a 65 push $0x65
> 3d7: 63 74 73 2f arpl %si,0x2f(%ebx,%esi,2)
> @@ -11642,13 +11642,13 @@
> 3e1: 65 gs
> 3e2: 2f das
> 3e3: 63 6f 6d arpl %bp,0x6d(%edi)
> - 3e6: 70 69 jo 451 <__FUNCTION__.21323+0x1>
> + 3e6: 70 69 jo 451 <__FUNCTION__.21236+0x1>
> 3e8: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 3e9: 65 gs
> -...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the