search for: 3e1

Hi All, I've been observing a very odd behaviour of Asterisk, when relating to SIP connections. Here's the scenario: Ast1 is an Asterisk box originating calls via a predictive dialer Ast2 is an Asterisk box connected to 3E1 circuits Ast1 originates calls to Ast2 via SIP, in order to utilize the PSTN lines. (There is a reason I'm using SIP here, so please don't say: "MOVE TO IAX"). Now, while Ast2 shows in the asterisk cdr's a clear BUSY disposition, for all those calls, Ast1 will only show...

...denied { create } for pid=3884 comm="dovecot" scontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 tclass=socket host=trailrunner type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241041651.976:33): arch=40000003 syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf851070 a2=9e45030 a3=3e1 items=0 ppid=3883 pid=3884 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="dovecot" exe="/usr/sbin/dovecot" subj=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 key=(null) The Raw Audit Message for Procmail is: Source Context...

...2453("A52RD@3%1$+T]5/4Y%0U1% M0T@O0TX]4D5#25!)14Y44R]#3CU"3TY$,4H`'@#X/P$````.````0F]N9"P@ M2F5F9F5R>0```!X`.$`!````!P```$)/3D0Q2@```@'[/P$```!<```````` M`-RG0,C`0A`:M+D(`"LOX8(!`````````"]//4Y%0R!414-(3D],3T=)15,@ M*%5+*2!,5$0O3U4]3D5#5$5#2"]#3CU214-)4$E%3E13+T-./4)/3D0Q2@`> M`/H_`0````X```!";VYD+"!*969F97)Y````'@`Y0`$````'````0D].1#%* M``!```<PP,+P:7NBO`%```@P<+K$2WZBO`$>`#T``0````$`````````'@`= M#@$````@````4F5D:&%T($QI;G5X(&%N9"!386UB82!C<F%S:&EN9P`>`#40 M`0```#(````\,#$T0T(V041#,$)#1#`Q,3A&qu...

Hi Timo, There was another thread (it has come up at least a few times in the past few years I've been lurking) on the postfix list about having some kind of automatic 'Save to Sent' option to avoid the users mail client from having to upload messages twice (obviously the only ones of concern are ones with large attachments) - once to send it, and once to save the copy in the sent

...R<F]R('-T<FEN M9R ]($]P97)A=&EO;B!N;W0@<W5P<&]R=&5D"ELR,# S+S$Q+S$Y(#(P.C$T M.C U+" S72!S;6)D+V5R<F]R+F,Z97)R;W)?<&%C:V5T*#$Q,RD*("!E<G)O M<B!P86-K970@870@<VUB9"]N='1R86YS+F,H,30R-BD@8VUD/3$V," H4TU" M;G1T<F%N<RD@3E1?4U1!5%537T%#0T534U]$14Y)140*6S(P,#,O,3$O,3D@ M,C Z,30Z,#4L(#-=('-M8F0O<')O8V5S<RYC.G!R;V-E<W-?<VUB*#@W."D* M("!4<F%N<V%C=&EO;B T,#,Y(&]F(&QE;F=T:" Y,0I;,C P,R\Q,2\Q.2 R M,#HQ-#HP-2P@,UT@<VUB9"]P<F]C97-S+F,Z<W=I=&-H7VUE<W-A9V4...

********************************************************************** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo s?o confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organiza??o para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique Redes@bnc.pt Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper n?o tendo sido encontrados virus.

I'm a mathematician and programmer working on experimental surround sound techniques. Some of the ideas I'm working on require dozens of channels. These channels are often highly correlated and are very well suited to compression. I'm new to Vorbis. Does it attempt to address such issues? Thanks, --Richard --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project

Hi, I'm trying to setup a small BRI ISDN <-> voip gateway. The ISDN card is based on Cologne chipset, so I try set it up with zaphfc. The versions i'm running: kernel-2.4.27 Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8e zaptel modules 1.0.7 zaphfc is from bristuff-0.2.0-RC8e When I'm doing the insmod on zaptel, zaphfc, zaprtc: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 PCI:

...N__.21160+0xd> > + 3d2: 70 72 jo 446 <__FUNCTION__.21073+0xd> > 3d4: 6f outsl %ds:(%esi),(%dx) > 3d5: 6a 65 push $0x65 > 3d7: 63 74 73 2f arpl %si,0x2f(%ebx,%esi,2) > @@ -11642,13 +11642,13 @@ > 3e1: 65 gs > 3e2: 2f das > 3e3: 63 6f 6d arpl %bp,0x6d(%edi) > - 3e6: 70 69 jo 451 <__FUNCTION__.21323+0x1> > + 3e6: 70 69 jo 451 <__FUNCTION__.21236+0x1> > 3e8: 6c...

The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the