search for: 3e0ae409

Hi James, > I get the expected output (after changing i32 @llvm.eh.selector() to i64 > llvm.eh.selector.i64()) in top-of-tree, llvm.eh.selector.i64 has been removed (though bitcode will autoupgrade) and there is only i32 @llvm.eh.selector(), which is why my example was written this way. Ciao, Duncan.

2010/1/22 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> > Hi James, > > > I get the expected output (after changing i32 @llvm.eh.selector() to i64 >> llvm.eh.selector.i64()) >> > > in top-of-tree, llvm.eh.selector.i64 has been removed (though bitcode will > autoupgrade) and there is only i32 @llvm.eh.selector(), which is why my > example > was written this way.

...I don't think it's due to any problem with LLVM eh table output -- James > >> Ciao, >> >> Duncan. >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100122/3e0ae409/attachment.html>