search for: 3d7f4932

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > Would people other than myself find it useful to have a standardized > extension framework for LLVM? I'm thinking of something that would allow > new LLVM instructions, fundamental types, structured types, etc. This > would require significant work to allow the various pieces of LLVM > (assembler, disassembler, runtime, JIT,

I was going to wait to bring this up but since the topic has been addressed ... Would people other than myself find it useful to have a standardized extension framework for LLVM? I'm thinking of something that would allow new LLVM instructions, fundamental types, structured types, etc. This would require significant work to allow the various pieces of LLVM (assembler, disassembler, runtime,

...o give this some more thought. Reid -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040327/3d7f4932/attachment.sig>