Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "3c8".
Did you mean:
38
2015 Jun 16
3
Progress on nv46 vblank bug
...and from there on everything is good.
So any hints how to mvoe forward with this are appreciated.
Regards,
Hans
p.s.
Possibly related, likely unrelated during nouveau module (re) load I get these 2 errors:
[ 240.837471] nouveau E[ PBUS][0000:01:00.0] MMIO write of 0x00000000 FAULT at 0x6833c8
[ 240.837945] nouveau E[ PBUS][0000:01:00.0] MMIO write of 0x4f4f5c4e FAULT at 0x6833c8
Where by the addresses listed as being written to (0x00000000 and 0x4f4f5c4e) are different
each module load, so they seem to be taken from uninitialized memory.
Hints on how to debug this are welcome too.
2016 Mar 23
1
Clang/LLVM producing incomplete & erroneous debug information
...ion!
When I compile with gcc:
$ gcc -O1 -g test.c -lpthread
And do a readelf, I get the following information:
<1><3c3>: Abbrev Number: 21 (DW_TAG_subprogram)
<3c4> DW_AT_external : 1
<3c4> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x23f): main
<3c8> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<3c9> DW_AT_decl_line : 16
<3ca> DW_AT_prototyped : 1
<3ca> DW_AT_type : <0x3f>
<3ce> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x4008a0
<3d6> DW_AT_high_pc : 0xe5
<3de> DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte bloc...
2011 Jun 06
1
libvirt-bin MOSTLY fails to create default virtual network
...tcpudp 2667 12 - Live 0xffffffffa01a5000
> nf_conntrack_ipv4 12742 14 - Live 0xffffffffa019b000
> nf_conntrack 73326 2 xt_state,nf_conntrack_ipv4, Live 0xffffffffa017d000
> nf_defrag_ipv4 1481 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4, Live 0xffffffffa0177000
> iptable_filter 1841 1 - Live 0xffffffffa008b000
3c8
< x_tables 22361 1 ip_tables, Live 0xffffffffa0162000
---
> x_tables 22361 3 xt_state,xt_tcpudp,ip_tables, Live 0xffffffffa0162000
Other observations:
Scenatio 1.
No errors in libvirtd.log
Scenario 2.
10:06:06.980: error : networkAddIptablesRules:750 : failed to add iptables
rule to allow D...
2005 Jan 24
0
Donate to NarutoFan.com for Child Porn
...a double opt in email system to confirm that all emails are indeed entered by the correct party. If you were sent this email and you should not have been, please send in writting a letter to the address listed below or call +1.4036155961.
Kevin Shiel
1735-246 Stewart Green S.W
Cagary, ALBERTA T3H-3C8
CA
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...;__FUNCTION__.20952+0xa>
> + 3bf: 73 65 jae 426 <__FUNCTION__.20866+0xa>
> 3c1: 5f pop %edi
> 3c2: 64 65 63 6c 00 2f arpl %bp,%fs:%gs:0x2f(%eax,%eax,1)
>
> 000003c7 <.str>:
> 3c7: 2f das
> - 3c8: 75 73 jne 43d <__FUNCTION__.21160+0x4>
> + 3c8: 75 73 jne 43d <__FUNCTION__.21073+0x4>
> 3ca: 65 gs
> - 3cb: 72 73 jb 440 <__FUNCTION__.21160+0x7>
> + 3cb: 72 73 jb 440...
2011 Jun 20
1
libvirt-users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 17
...but wouldn't be
> surprised if adding rules that required conntrack failed if it hadn't
> been loaded, or something like that.
>
> > > nf_defrag_ipv4 1481 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4, Live 0xffffffffa0177000
> > > iptable_filter 1841 1 - Live 0xffffffffa008b000
> > 3c8
> > < x_tables 22361 1 ip_tables, Live 0xffffffffa0162000
> > ---
> > > x_tables 22361 3 xt_state,xt_tcpudp,ip_tables, Live 0xffffffffa0162000
> >
> > Other observations:
> > Scenatio 1.
> > No errors in libvirtd.log
> > Scenario 2.
> >
&g...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the