Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "3be3166d".
2012 Nov 01
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level
...NaNs under the N
flag, this would seem to be ok. However, a trap is outside the boundaries
of "undefined result". So, which half is right?
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121101/3be3166d/attachment.html>
2012 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level
On Oct 30, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Michael Ilseman <milseman at apple.com> wrote:
> Here's a new version of the RFC, incorporating and addressing the feedback from Krzysztof, Eli, Duncan, and Dan.
>
>
> Revision 1 changes:
> * Removed Fusion flag from all sections
> * Clarified and
2012 Oct 30
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Michael Ilseman <milseman at apple.com> wrote:
> Here's a new version of the RFC, incorporating and addressing the feedback
> from Krzysztof, Eli, Duncan, and Dan.
>
>
> Revision 1 changes:
> * Removed Fusion flag from all sections
> * Clarified and changed descriptions of remaining flags:
> * Make 'N' and