search for: 3ad93341

> It sounds like the linker could call lto_module_dispose() right after > lto_codegen_add_module() to help reduce the memory footprint. That would be > a simple linker change. A slightly larger linker change would be to > immediately call lto_codegen_add_module() right after > lto_module_create_from_memory(), then lto_module_dispose(). That is, never > have any unmerged

On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chandler, > > I don't quite get why you think sharing is not buying us anything... > It reduces the memory footprint of the source modules (there is sharing among the source modules) and the number of

...e advantage is that the MDNodes can be deleted easily by deleting the module. It is not clearly a win to me. Manman > > Cheers, > Rafael > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131113/3ad93341/attachment.html>