search for: 3a__bugs

...w Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 2:14 PM To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> There was another bug that seems related to this which is https://bugs.llvm.org/...

...*Date: *Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 2:14 PM > *To: *LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? > > > > I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> > > There was another bug that seems related to this which is > https:/...

I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 There was another bug that seems related to this which is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35032 but that one is marked fixed. But this seems to be an issue in trunk. Is this a known issue? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...*To: *LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >>> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >>> >>> >>> >>> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >>> >>> There was another bug that seems related to this which...

...018 at 2:14 PM >> *To: *LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >> >> >> >> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >> >> There was another bug that seems related to this which is >...

...dev at lists.llvm.org> >>>> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] can valgrind read LLD's debug info? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I just filed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37021 >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D37021&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=LOIzu9sn31pmykUwYH1_wAigCpxv33qUDNdmOrmGop4&s=2_EmscX6fjQZR0pF1CQWKUPDgpBLCJhFfnOvlkivJBE&e=> >>>> >>>> There was another bug that seems related to th...

...gt; Subject: [llvm-dev] trivial input provokes failed assertion in Parser.h:322 While attempting to reduce a ubsan-specific bug, I stumbled upon the following. [I would have filed a bug report, but don't have an account, and so requested one per https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=R7rHNXVz33pSWF-LHSh3QPvscmWjtF3epbTUw2ufAVc&s=RfIC9dWnWb3gOLdPM-6SkfL2fbaalJuQueD53kQUo2Y&e= about 7 hours ago -- but still no response, so am sending this instead. ] Using clang built from latest master...

...l input provokes failed assertion in Parser.h:322 > > While attempting to reduce a ubsan-specific bug, I stumbled upon the following. <> > [I would have filed a bug report, but don't have an account, and so > requested one per https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=R7rHNXVz33pSWF-LHSh3QPvscmWjtF3epbTUw2ufAVc&s=RfIC9dWnWb3gOLdPM-6SkfL2fbaalJuQueD53kQUo2Y&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3M...

While attempting to reduce a ubsan-specific bug, I stumbled upon the following. [I would have filed a bug report, but don't have an account, and so requested one per https://bugs.llvm.org/ about 7 hours ago -- but still no response, so am sending this instead. ] Using clang built from latest master of about 5 hours ago: $ echo struct a typename a | clang -x c++ - <stdin>:1:19: error:

...ructions exceeds the maximum branch >> range. >> >> I have an implementation in review but it is a fairly large change so >> it may take some time to get through the review process, I've raised >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D33612&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=MoG8NHuM6pLu1J1B-yHnV-uqDvXgdp72ydIhDlNyQ9Q&s=RpqKAJtCInfokC4ejkvv1e1hbMx22g7c6-v8JNuzOrY&e= that has a link to the >> Phab reviews. If you are willing to build your...

Looks like I have run into the same issue reported in: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20871 Is there a fix or work-around for it? The bug report seems to be still open. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171005/46c1282d/attachment.html>

...maximum branch >>> range. >>> >>> I have an implementation in review but it is a fairly large change so >>> it may take some time to get through the review process, I've raised >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D33612&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=MoG8NHuM6pLu1J1B-yHnV-uqDvXgdp72ydIhDlNyQ9Q&s=RpqKAJtCInfokC4ejkvv1e1hbMx22g7c6-v8JNuzOrY&e= that has a link to the >>> Phab reviews. If you are willing to build y...

This looks similar to the problem I fixed awhile back in r292408. I'll take a look (probably tomorrow since I am taking some vacation today). Teresa On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:43 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > +Teresa > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:20 AM David Callahan via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I am tracking a

...>>>> range. >>>>> >>>>> I have an implementation in review but it is a fairly large change so >>>>> it may take some time to get through the review process, I've raised >>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D33612&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=MoG8NHuM6pLu1J1B-yHnV-uqDvXgdp72ydIhDlNyQ9Q&s=RpqKAJtCInfokC4ejkvv1e1hbMx22g7c6-v8JNuzOrY&e= that has a link to the >>>>> Phab reviews. If you are willing to bui...

Hi everyone, The WebAssembly backend recently had Bug 39448 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39448> filed against it because NaN payloads in floating-point immediates are not preserved through compilation on 32-bit builds. I took a look and the corruption takes place when the immediates are converted from APFloats to be stored as native doubles in MCOperand. I assume this bug only

...19 is completely redundant. It is a phi of the computations in 9 and 17. Once done (almost!), newgvn will actually detect that a simple phi inserted in 17 would have the same value as %21. The work is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=31868<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org__show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D31868&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=kOsLCgQzH7N8ptZ7diJD9g&m=Sv5T08BLc94DspNTrXv67YwHnXVNmVllN9p8B7fZgTs&s=bOw6bI0rowF-LG3wUx222kr4j4lEwZCz1sGk-DR39Ts&e=> Wwhen we see op of phis, we use fake instructions to treat it like we saw ops...

...19 is completely redundant. It is a phi of the computations in 9 and 17. Once done (almost!), newgvn will actually detect that a simple phi inserted in 17 would have the same value as %21. The work is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=31868<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org__show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D31868&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=kOsLCgQzH7N8ptZ7diJD9g&m=Sv5T08BLc94DspNTrXv67YwHnXVNmVllN9p8B7fZgTs&s=bOw6bI0rowF-LG3wUx222kr4j4lEwZCz1sGk-DR39Ts&e=> Wwhen we see op of phis, we use fake instructions to treat it like we saw ops...

...ot;PACKAGE_NAME=\"Mesa\"" -D "PACKAGE_TARNAME=\"mesa\"" -D >> "PACKAGE_VERSION=\"10.4.4\"" -D "PACKAGE_STRING=\"Mesa 10.4.4\"" -D >> "PACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.freedesktop.org_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DMesa&d=AwID-g&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=zfmBZnnVGHeYde45pMKNnVyzeaZbdIqVLprmZCM2zzE&m=LdbG9btkWrIw7ABhWDTiHtGwFnB7cDCY6cHlnzXawlQ&s=sH_YjhwwusfBRXm5X-z7LRFkCz68ItpSfCmRnHJAYkw&e= \"" >> -D &quo...

...n Nov 12 10:22:43 2018, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 Source RPM : texlive-2012-43.20130427_r30134.el7.src.rpm Build Date : Tue Oct 30 17:08:55 2018 Build Host : x86-01.bsys.centos.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager : CentOS BuildSystem <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bugs.centos.org&d=DwIBAg&c=l0Se2EoYzVDuQxIIfySraQ&r=ikT9mQBX0oceFUNOZ9sWg7xwG2CuIC6bHyRUELsg5N4&m=JAB5Fu4kIDYWQa4apYgUV22E0Al3NiZXEWI5j0raw48&s=fUdnDJUL8UXxc6ouXZilch8a09bOHMoBhMYRTRdYnJs&e= > Vendor : CentOS URL : https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3...

On 28.05.2018 16:38, Martin Maechler wrote: > Then, I now do think this needs to be dealt with as a bug > (but I'm not delving into fixing it!) Ok. Can somebody with write privileges in bugzilla add the bug report? I can also do this myself, if somebody with the required privileges can create a user for me. Greetings Ralf PS: I get an error message from